ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2021
Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Tourette Syndrome: Electrode Position and Clinical Outcome.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ethical, legal, and sociocultural considerations in neural device explantation: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Surgical Concepts and Long-term Outcomes of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Severe Tourette Syndrome: A Single-center Experience.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2024Article
- European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part IV: deep brain stimulation.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2022Review
- Recent progress on Tourette syndrome.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory Tourette syndrome (TS) is accepted, but whether the efficacy of DBS treatment in the Japanese population is equivalent to those reported internationally and whether adverse effects are comparable are not yet known. This study evaluated the clinical practice and outcome of DBS for TS in a Japanese institution. This study included 25 consecutive patients with refractory TS treated with thalamic centromedian-parafascicular nucleus DBS. The severity of tics was evaluated with the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) before surgery, at 1 year after surgery, and at the last follow-up of 3 years or more after surgery. The occurrence of adverse events, active contact locations, and stimulation conditions were also evaluated. YGTSS tic severity score decreased by average 45.2% at 1 year, and by 56.6% at the last follow-up. The reduction was significant for all aspects of the scores including motor tics, phonic tics, and impairment. The mean coordinates of active contacts were 7.62 mm lateral to the midline, 3.28 mm posterior to the midcommissural point, and 3.41 mm above anterior commissure-posterior commissure plane. Efficacy and stimulation conditions were equivalent to international reports. The stimulation-induced side effects included dysarthria (32.0%) and paresthesia (12.0%). Device infection occurred in three patients (12.0%) as a surgical complication. The DBS device was removed because of infection in two patients. DBS is an effective treatment for refractory TS, although careful indication is necessary because of the surgical risks and unknown long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.