Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239354›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2020

Estimating the global economic benefits of physically active populations over 30 years (2020-2050).

Marco Hafner, Erez Yerushalmi, Martin Stepanek, William Phillips, Jack Pollard, Advait Deshpande, Michael Whitmore, Francois Millard, Shaun Subel, Christian van Stolk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Which resistance training is safest to practice? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco HafnerRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK mhafner@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-014X
Erez YerushalmiBirmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9421-9067
Martin StepanekCharles University, Institute of Economic Studies, Praha, Praha, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7368-3680
William PhillipsRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Jack PollardHealth Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Advait DeshpandeRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Michael WhitmoreRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Francois MillardVitality Group, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shaun SubelVitality Group, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christian van StolkRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assess the potential benefits of increased physical activity for the global economy for 23 countries and the rest of the world from 2020 to 2050. The main factors taken into account in the economic assessment are excess mortality and lower productivity.

methodsThis study links three methodologies. First, we estimate the association between physical inactivity and workplace productivity using multivariable regression models with proprietary data on 120 143 individuals in the UK and six Asian countries (Australia, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Thailand, Singapore and Sri Lanka). Second, we analyse the association between physical activity and mortality risk through a meta-regression analysis with data from 74 prior studies with global coverage. Finally, the estimated effects are combined in a computable general equilibrium macroeconomic model to project the economic benefits of physical activity over time.

resultsDoing at least 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, as per lower limit of the range recommended by the 2020 WHO guidelines, would lead to an increase in global gross domestic product (GDP) of 0.15%-0.24% per year by 2050, worth up to US$314-446 billion per year and US$6.0-8.6 trillion cumulatively over the 30-year projection horizon (in 2019 prices). The results vary by country due to differences in baseline levels of physical activity and GDP per capita.

conclusionsIncreasing physical activity in the population would lead to reduction in working-age mortality and morbidity and an increase in productivity, particularly through lower presenteeism, leading to substantial economic gains for the global economy.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorGlobal HealthGross Domestic ProductHealth PromotionHumansMortalityeconomicsphysical activitystatistics

Identifiers

PMID33239354
PMCPMC7719903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.