Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239153›Full record

ArticleSemergen

[Remote consultation: information for Primary Care physicians].

H Eguia, F Vinciarelli, R L Villoslada Muñiz, F J Sanz García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Semergen. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H EguiaAtención Primaria; Grupo de trabajo de nuevas tecnologías SEMERGEN, DSAM-Dinamarca, Rudkøbing lægehuset, Dinamarca. Electronic address: hello@hanseguia.doctor.
F VinciarelliHospital de Emergencias Clemente Álvarez; Grupo de trabajo de nuevas tecnologías SEMERGEN, Rosario (Santa Fe), Argentina.
R L Villoslada MuñizAtención Primaria, Centro de Salud Valencia de Don Juan Área I; Grupo de trabajo de nuevas tecnologías SEMERGEN, León, España.
F J Sanz GarcíaAtención Primaria, Conselleria de Sanitat Valenciana; Grupo de trabajo de nuevas tecnologías SEMERGEN, Valencia, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the current pandemic, there is now the possibility of using technological tools, such as teleconsultation or remote consultation. In rural or even semi-urban areas, access to medical services may be restricted due to transportation problems. In other places access to the consultations is limited to avoid contagion from the patient or healthcare personnel. This is why technological solutions are used to allow us to monitor our patients remotely, especially in the case of chronic patients, or as a form of triage to potential patients with coronavirus. Unfortunately, this type of system has not been used with the same continuity as in other countries, and very often our health personnel do not know the correct way to carry out a teleconsultation (by phone or video). With this document, an initial guide is presented on how to make a teleconsultation in Primary Care.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingCOVID-19Family PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareRemote ConsultationTelephoneVideoconferencinge-healthTeleasistenciaTelecareTeleconsultaTeleconsultationTelehealthTelemedicinaTelemedicineTelesalud

Identifiers

PMID33239153
PMCPMC7524681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.