Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239083›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020

Discordance between patient and physician global assessment of disease activity in Behçet's syndrome: a multicenter study cohort.

Alberto Floris, Gerard Espinosa, Luisa Serpa Pinto, Nikolaos Kougkas, Andrea Lo Monaco, Giuseppe Lopalco, Ida Orlando, George Bertsias, Luca Cantarini, Ricard Cervera and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Alberto FlorisRheumatology Unit, AOU University Clinic, Cagliari, Italy.
Gerard EspinosaDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Luisa Serpa PintoHospital Santo Antonio Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Unidade de Imunologia Clinica, Porto, Portugal.
Nikolaos KougkasRheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Andrea Lo MonacoRheumatology Unit, AOU S. Anna di Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Giuseppe LopalcoRheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ida OrlandoRheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
George BertsiasRheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Luca CantariniRheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Ricard CerveraDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
João CorreiaHospital Santo Antonio Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Unidade de Imunologia Clinica, Porto, Portugal.
Marcello GovoniRheumatology Unit, AOU S. Anna di Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Florenzo IannoneRheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandro MathieuRheumatology Unit, AOU University Clinic, Cagliari, Italy.
Piergiorgio NeriOphthalmology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Ana Martins SilvaNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto/Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Carlos VasconcelosUMIB Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Monica MuntoniAssociazione Italiana Sindrome e Malattia di Behçet (SIMBA), Pontedera, Italy.
Alberto CauliRheumatology Unit, AOU University Clinic, Cagliari, Italy.
Matteo PigaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Sanità Pubblica, Università di Cagliari, SS 554, 09042, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy. matteopiga@unica.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1126-8315
BODI Project collaborators
University of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the patients' and physician's global assessment of disease activity in Behçet's syndrome (BS) and investigate the frequency, magnitude, and determinants of potential discordance.

methodsA total of 226 adult BS patients with a median (IQR) age of 46.9 (35.6-55.2) years were enrolled across Italy, Greece, Portugal, and Spain. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic variables, as well as the patient reported outcomes, were collected at the recruitment visit. The physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores of the Short Form Questionnaire 36 (SF-36) and the Behçet's syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) were calculated. Disease activity was assessed by the patients' (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PGA) in a 10-cm visual analog scale, as well as the Behçet Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF). Discordance (∆) was calculated by subtracting the PGA from the PtGA and defined as positive (PtGA>PGA) and negative (PtGA<PGA) discordance using both a more stringent (∆ = ±2) and a less stringent (∆ = ±1) cutoff. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed.

resultsMedian PtGA and PGA scores were 2.0 (0.3-5.0) and 1.0 (0.0-3.0) cm, respectively. The discordance prevalence varied (from 29.6 to 55.3%) according to the cutoff applied, and the majority (> 80%) of disagreements were due to patients rating higher their disease activity. Higher values of BDCAF were associated to increased rate of positive discordance. When BDCAF = 0, the median (IQR) values of PtGA and PGA were 0.2 (0-2) and 0 (0-1), respectively. PCS (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 0.96 per unit, 95% CI 0.93-0.98, p = 0.006) and MCS (adjOR 0.96 per unit, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.003) were independently associated with positive discordance using both cutoffs. Active ocular involvement emerged as a potential determinant of negative discordance (adjOR 5.88, 95% CI 1.48-23.30, p = 0.012).

conclusionsPtGA and PGA should be considered as complementary measures in BS, as patients and physicians may be influenced by different factors when assessing active disease manifestations. Particularly, PtGA may be a useful tool in the assessment of BS disease activity, as it carries a low risk to misclassify an inactive disease, and may allow to capture aspects of the patient's health that negatively affect his well-being and the treatment.

Indexed as

Behcet SyndromePhysiciansAdultGreeceHumansItalyMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSpainBehçet’s syndromeDisease activityOutcome measurePatients reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33239083
PMCPMC7687797
OpenAlexW3109873832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.