Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239079›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Feasibility and initial efficacy of a high-intensity interval training program using adaptive equipment in persons with multiple sclerosis who have walking disability: study protocol for a single-group, feasibility trial.

Elizabeth A Hubbard, Robert W Motl, David J Elmer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04416243 (A Single-group, Feasibility, and Initial Efficacy Study of a High-intensity Interval Training Program Using Adaptive Equipment in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Walking Disability), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04416243 nacompletednot on this map

A Single-group, Feasibility, and Initial Efficacy Study of a High-intensity Interval Training Program Using Adaptive Equipment in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Walking Disability

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Texas, Denton, TXRan2019 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsRecumbent Stepping, High-Intensity Interval Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A HubbardDepartment of Kinesiology, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, USA. lhubbard@berry.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-7408
Robert W MotlDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
David J ElmerDepartment of Kinesiology, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, USA.
Berry College · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

National Multiple Sclerosis Society PP-1905-33971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable evidence for the efficacy of moderate-intensity continuous exercise benefitting clinically relevant outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, persons with MS who have walking disability (pwMS-wd) are severely deconditioned and may achieve superior benefits by engaging in high-intensity interval training (HIIT), especially while utilizing adaptive equipment, such as recumbent arm/leg stepping (RSTEP). The proposed study will assess the feasibility of a 12-week, RSTEP HIIT program in pwMS-wd. The secondary aim will examine changes in aerobic fitness, physical activity, ambulation, upper arm function, cognition, fatigue, and depression as clinically relevant efficacy outcomes following the 12-week, RSTEP HIIT intervention.

methodsThe study will recruit 15 pwMS-wd. Feasibility will be measured via process, resource, management, and scientific outcomes throughout the entirety of the research study. The secondary, clinically relevant outcomes will consist of a neurological exam, aerobic capacity, physical activity, ambulation, cognition, upper arm function, fatigue, and depression. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline (T1), midpoint (T2, following 6 weeks), and post-intervention (T3, following 12 weeks). The intervention will involve 12 weeks of supervised, individualized HIIT sessions two to three times per week. The individual HIIT sessions will each involve 10 cycles of 60-s intervals at the wattage associated with 90% VO DISCUSSION: The feasibility design of the proposed study will provide experience and preliminary data for advancing towards a proof-of-concept study comparing HIIT to moderate-intensity continuous RSTEP for improving clinically relevant outcomes in a randomized control trial design. The results will be disseminated via manuscripts for publication and a report for distribution among the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04416243 . Retrospectively registered on June 4, 2020.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingMultiple SclerosisWalkingExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansMobility LimitationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAdaptive equipmentExercise rehabilitationFeasibilityHigh-intensity interval trainingInterventionMultiple sclerosisRecumbent steppingRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33239079
PMCPMC7687792
OpenAlexW3107109102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.