Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239023›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2020

The accuracy and safety of CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation assisted by 3D non-coplanar template for retroperitoneal recurrent carcinoma.

Weijuan Jiang, Ping Jiang, Shuhua Wei, Yuliang Jiang, Zhe Ji, Haitao Sun, Jinghong Fan, Weiyan Li, Yuxia Shao, Junjie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Local efficacy and safety of CT-guided Iodine-125 seed implantation in the treatment of recurrent malignant tumors: a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative study for CT-guidedBMC medical imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chinese Expert Consensus on IodineFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weijuan JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Ping JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Shuhua WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Yuliang JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Zhe JiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Haitao SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Jinghong FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Weiyan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Yuxia ShaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China. junjiewang_edu@sina.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61631001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the accuracy, dosimetric parameters, and safety of 3D-printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT)-assisted CT guidance for radioactive iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation brachytherapy (RSI-BT) for retroperitoneal recurrent carcinomas METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled 15 patients with 17 retroperitoneal recurrent carcinomas after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). All patients received CT-guided 125I RSI-BT assisted by 3D-PNCT successfully. We compared the original needle insertion position, angular, and the needle tip distance deviations of preoperative plan with that of intraoperative in brachytherapy treatment planning system (B-TPS). The dosimetric parameters of RSI-BT were evaluated on preoperative plan, intraoperative real-time plan, and postoperative plan, including D90, D100 (the dose to 90% and 100% of the target volume), V100, V150, and V200 (the volume receives 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed doses). The quality assurance of RSI-BT evaluated on conformal index (CI), external index (EI), and homogeneity index (HI) of the targets were compared among preoperative plan, intraoperative real-time plan, and postoperative plan. The perioperation complications and RSI-BT-related toxicity were assessed.

resultsThe median follow-up was 8.2 months (range 1-18.5 months). One patient was lost to follow-up after RSI-BT. Fourteen patients were assessed for response rate and toxicity. The mean entrance point distance deviation for all 165 needles was 4.50 ± 4.10 mm (range, 0-30). The mean angular deviation was 2.70 ± 3.00° (range, 0-20). The needle tip distance deviation was 6.90 ± 6.00 mm (range, - 30-28). D90 for preoperative plan, intraoperative plan, and postoperative plan were 140.55 ± 23.93, 124.25 ± 28.04, and 128.98 ± 22.75, respectively. There was significant difference between D90 of preoperative plan with that of intraoperative plan (p = 0.036). Four lesions reached CR, six lesions reached PR, three lesions were SD, and three lesions were PD. Four patients with moderate pain became mild, and two with mild pain relieved completely after RSI-BT. The other parameters showed no differences among preoperative plan, intraoperative plan, and postoperative plan. The perioperative complications were observed in four patients, including three patients of grade 1 and one patient of grade 2. No ≥ grade 3 side effects were observed.

conclusionCT-guided 125I RSI-BT assisted by 3D-PNCT was a safe, accurate, and feasible strategy for recurrent carcinomas located in the retroperitoneal regions.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCarcinomaThyroid NeoplasmsHumansIodine RadioisotopesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedIodine-125Iodine Radioisotopes3D-printing non-coplanar templateAccuracyLDR brachytherapyRetroperitoneal carcinomaSeed implantation

Identifiers

PMID33239023
PMCPMC7690097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.