Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239017›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2020

Moral structuring of children during the process of obtaining informed consent in clinical and research settings.

Anderson Díaz-Pérez, Elkin Navarro Quiroz, Dilia Esther Aparicio Marenco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anderson Díaz-PérezDepartment of Social and Human Sciences, Simón Bolívar University, Barranquilla, Colombia. ander2711@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-0953
Elkin Navarro QuirozFaculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Simón Bolívar University, Carrera 59 No 59-65 Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7567-6409
Dilia Esther Aparicio MarencoCorporación Universitaria Rafael Núñez, Faculty Of Health sciences, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4000-4677

Funding

Authors own 3014288467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformed consent is an important factor in a child's moral structure from which different types of doctor-patient relationships arise. Children's autonomy is currently under discussion in terms of their decent treatment, beyond what doctors and researchers perceive. To describe the influential practices that exist among clinicians and researchers toward children with chronic diseases during the process of obtaining informed consent.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, qualitative study via a subjective and interpretivist approach. The study was performed by conducting semi-structured interviews of 21 clinicians and researchers. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS version 21® and Atlas Ti version 7.0® programs.

resultsThe deliberative and paternalistic models were influential practices in the physician-patient relationship. In the deliberative model, the child is expected to have a moral awareness of their care. The paternalistic model determined that submission was a way of structuring the child because he or she is considered to be a subject of extreme care.

conclusionsThe differentiated objectification [educational] process recognizes the internal and external elements of the child. Informed consent proved to be an appropriate means for strengthening moral and structuring the child.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentMoralsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePaternalismPhysician-Patient RelationsAutonomyBiomedicalCapacityChildrenClinicalConsentDoctor–patient relationshipInformed consent in minorsInvestigatorMoralPaternalismPediatricsPracticesUnderstanding

Identifiers

PMID33239017
PMCPMC7687690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.