Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239006›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020

Machine-learning classification of texture features of portable chest X-ray accurately classifies COVID-19 lung infection.

Lal Hussain, Tony Nguyen, Haifang Li, Adeel A Abbasi, Kashif J Lone, Zirun Zhao, Mahnoor Zaib, Anne Chen, Tim Q Duong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deep learning framework for rapid and accurate respiratory COVID-19 prediction using chest X-ray images.Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lal HussainDepartment of Computer Science and IT, King Abdullah Campus, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. lall_hussain2008@live.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-4938
Tony NguyenDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Haifang LiDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Adeel A AbbasiDepartment of Computer Science and IT, King Abdullah Campus, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Kashif J LoneDepartment of Computer Science and IT, King Abdullah Campus, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, 13100, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Zirun ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Mahnoor ZaibDepartment of Computer Science and IT, Neelum Campus, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Athmuqam, 13230, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Anne ChenDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Tim Q DuongDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Stony Brook School · USUniversity of Azad Jammu and Kashmir · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe large volume and suboptimal image quality of portable chest X-rays (CXRs) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could post significant challenges for radiologists and frontline physicians. Deep-learning artificial intelligent (AI) methods have the potential to help improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for reading portable CXRs. PURPOSE: The study aimed at developing an AI imaging analysis tool to classify COVID-19 lung infection based on portable CXRs. MATERIALS AND

methodsPublic datasets of COVID-19 (N = 130), bacterial pneumonia (N = 145), non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia (N = 145), and normal (N = 138) CXRs were analyzed. Texture and morphological features were extracted. Five supervised machine-learning AI algorithms were used to classify COVID-19 from other conditions. Two-class and multi-class classification were performed. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired two-tailed t tests with unequal variance between groups. Performance of classification models used the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsFor the two-class classification, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 100%, 100%, and 100% for COVID-19 vs normal; 96.34%, 95.35% and 97.44% for COVID-19 vs bacterial pneumonia; and 97.56%, 97.44% and 97.67% for COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. For the multi-class classification, the combined accuracy and AUC were 79.52% and 0.87, respectively.

conclusionAI classification of texture and morphological features of portable CXRs accurately distinguishes COVID-19 lung infection in patients in multi-class datasets. Deep-learning methods have the potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for portable CXRs.

Indexed as

Machine LearningCOVID-19HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung DiseasesRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedClassificationCOVID-19Feature extractionMachine learningMorphologicalTexture

Identifiers

PMID33239006
PMCPMC7686836
OpenAlexW3108203735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.