Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33238875›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Improving biomedical named entity recognition with syntactic information.

Yuanhe Tian, Wang Shen, Yan Song, Fei Xia, Min He, Kenli Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuanhe TianUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Wang ShenHunan University, Changsha, China.
Yan SongThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China. songyan@cuhk.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2849-2962
Fei XiaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Min HeHunan University, Changsha, China.
Kenli LiHunan University, Changsha, China.

Funding

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) UDF01001809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical named entity recognition (BioNER) is an important task for understanding biomedical texts, which can be challenging due to the lack of large-scale labeled training data and domain knowledge. To address the challenge, in addition to using powerful encoders (e.g., biLSTM and BioBERT), one possible method is to leverage extra knowledge that is easy to obtain. Previous studies have shown that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource to improve model performance, but their approaches are limited to directly concatenating the embeddings of syntactic information to the input word embeddings. Therefore, such syntactic information is leveraged in an inflexible way, where inaccurate one may hurt model performance.

resultsIn this paper, we propose BIOKMNER, a BioNER model for biomedical texts with key-value memory networks (KVMN) to incorporate auto-processed syntactic information. We evaluate BIOKMNER on six English biomedical datasets, where our method with KVMN outperforms the strong baseline method, namely, BioBERT, from the previous study on all datasets. Specifically, the F1 scores of our best performing model are 85.29% on BC2GM, 77.83% on JNLPBA, 94.22% on BC5CDR-chemical, 90.08% on NCBI-disease, 89.24% on LINNAEUS, and 76.33% on Species-800, where state-of-the-art performance is obtained on four of them (i.e., BC2GM, BC5CDR-chemical, NCBI-disease, and Species-800).

conclusionThe experimental results on six English benchmark datasets demonstrate that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource for BioNER and our method with KVMN can appropriately leverage such information to improve model performance.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningSemanticsDatabases as TopicDeep LearningStatistics as TopicKey-value memory networksNamed entity recognitionNeural networksSyntactic informationText mining

Identifiers

PMID33238875
PMCPMC7687711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.