ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Improving biomedical named entity recognition with syntactic information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A diffusion enhanced CRF and BiLSTM framework for accurate entity recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomedical named entity recognition using improved green anaconda-assisted Bi-GRU-based hierarchical ResNet model.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A prefix and attention map discrimination fusion guided attention for biomedical named entity recognition.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- BioByGANS: biomedical named entity recognition by fusing contextual and syntactic features through graph attention network in node classification framework.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Biomedical named entity recognition with the combined feature attention and fully-shared multi-task learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Discovering and Summarizing Relationships Between Chemicals, Genes, Proteins, and Diseases in PubChem.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiomedical named entity recognition (BioNER) is an important task for understanding biomedical texts, which can be challenging due to the lack of large-scale labeled training data and domain knowledge. To address the challenge, in addition to using powerful encoders (e.g., biLSTM and BioBERT), one possible method is to leverage extra knowledge that is easy to obtain. Previous studies have shown that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource to improve model performance, but their approaches are limited to directly concatenating the embeddings of syntactic information to the input word embeddings. Therefore, such syntactic information is leveraged in an inflexible way, where inaccurate one may hurt model performance.
resultsIn this paper, we propose BIOKMNER, a BioNER model for biomedical texts with key-value memory networks (KVMN) to incorporate auto-processed syntactic information. We evaluate BIOKMNER on six English biomedical datasets, where our method with KVMN outperforms the strong baseline method, namely, BioBERT, from the previous study on all datasets. Specifically, the F1 scores of our best performing model are 85.29% on BC2GM, 77.83% on JNLPBA, 94.22% on BC5CDR-chemical, 90.08% on NCBI-disease, 89.24% on LINNAEUS, and 76.33% on Species-800, where state-of-the-art performance is obtained on four of them (i.e., BC2GM, BC5CDR-chemical, NCBI-disease, and Species-800).
conclusionThe experimental results on six English benchmark datasets demonstrate that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource for BioNER and our method with KVMN can appropriately leverage such information to improve model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.