Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33238498›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Effect Evaluation of Spatial Characteristics on Map Matching-Based Indoor Positioning.

Shuaiwei Luo, Fuqiang Gu, Fan Xu, Jianga Shang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuaiwei LuoSchool of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Fuqiang GuSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117418, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-982X
Fan XuSchool of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
Jianga ShangSchool of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China.
China University of Geosciences · CNNational University of Singapore · SGPingdingshan University · CN

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFB0502204)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Map-matching is a popular method that uses spatial information to improve the accuracy of positioning methods. The performance of map matching methods is closely related to spatial characteristics. Although several studies have demonstrated that certain map matching algorithms are affected by some spatial structures (e.g., parallel paths), they focus on the analysis of single map matching method or few spatial structures. In this study, we explored how the most commonly-used four spatial characteristics (namely forks, open spaces, corners, and narrow corridors) affect three popular map matching methods, namely particle filtering (PF), hidden Markov model (HMM), and geometric methods. We first provide a theoretical analysis on how spatial characteristics affect the performance of map matching methods, and then evaluate these effects through experiments. We found that corners and narrow corridors are helpful in improving the positioning accuracy, while forks and open spaces often lead to a larger positioning error. We hope that our findings are helpful for future researchers in choosing proper map matching algorithms with considering the spatial characteristics.

Indexed as

geometrichidden Markov modelindoor positioningmap matchingparticle filteringspatial information

Identifiers

PMID33238498
PMCPMC7700450
OpenAlexW3110222378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.