Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33238049›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews2022

Evaluation of major historical ICR cell designs using electric field simulations.

Evgeny Nikolaev, Anton Lioznov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evgeny NikolaevCenter for Computational and Data-Intensive Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Anton LioznovCenter for Computational and Data-Intensive Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, ions are detected by measuring image current induced in the detecting electrodes by trapped ions rotating in a magnetic field at their cyclotron frequencies. The ion trap used for this purpose is called the Penning trap. It can have various configurations of electrodes that are used to create a trapping electric field, to excite cyclotron motion, and to detect the induced signal. The evolution of this type of mass spectrometry is mainly driven by progress in the technology of superconducting magnets and in the constantly improved design of the ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) measuring cell. In this review, we focus on ICR cell designs. We consider that the driving forces of this evolution are the desire to increase resolution, mass accuracy and dynamic range, as well as to adapt new methods for creating and trapping ions.

Indexed as

CyclotronsFourier AnalysisIonsMass SpectrometryIonsFT-ICRICR cellion cyclotron resonanceion trapsMSresolving power

Identifiers

PMID33238049
PMCPMC9292346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.