Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33238043›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults.

Joanne Guay, Sandra Kopp

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05505604 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsFemoral Neck Fractures, Intertrochanteric FracturesArmsPENG, FICB
NCT05749367 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Blocks Versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block in Postoperative Analgesia of Hip Fractures: a Prospective, Controlled, Randomized and Double Blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Minas GeraisRan2023 to 2023Enrolled66ConditionsAnesthesia, ConductionArmsRopivacaine + saline solution, Saline solution + Ropivacaine
NCT05840458 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Systemic Analgesia and Systemic Analgesia Associated With Pericapsular Nerve Block in Proximal Femoral Fractures

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Sirio-LibanesRan2023 to 2024Enrolled21ConditionsFemoral FractureArmsPENG Block
NCT06696404 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Nerve Block-Constructed Precision Anesthesia on Perioperative Organ Protection in Hip Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsElderly (People Aged 65 or More), Hip Fracture, Delirium - Postoperative, Organ ProtectionArmsCombined Lumbar Plexus and Sacral Plexus Block, iliac fascial block, spinal anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group block with ultrasonography in patients diagnosed with hip fracture in the emergency department.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanne GuayDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Sandra KoppDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review was published originally in 1999 and was updated in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2017, and 2020. Updating was deemed necessary due to the high incidence of hip fractures, the large number of official societies providing recommendations on this condition, the possibility that perioperative peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) may improve patient outcomes, and the major role that PNBs may play in reducing preoperative and postoperative opioid use for analgesia.

objectivesTo compare PNBs used as preoperative analgesia, as postoperative analgesia, or as a supplement to general anaesthesia versus no nerve block (or sham block) for adults with hip fracture. Outcomes were pain on movement at 30 minutes after block placement, acute confusional state, myocardial infarction, chest infection, death, time to first mobilization, and costs of an analgesic regimen for single-injection blocks. We undertook the update to look for new studies and to update the methods to reflect Cochrane standards. SEARCH

methodsFor the updated review, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 11), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to November 2019); Embase (Ovid SP, 1974 to November 2019); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO, 1982 to November 2019), as well as trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of PNBs compared with no nerve block (or sham block) as part of the care provided for adults 16 years of age and older with hip fracture.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened new trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool, and extracted data. When appropriate, we pooled results of outcome measures. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN

resultsWe included 49 trials (3061 participants; 1553 randomized to PNBs and 1508 to no nerve block (or sham block)). For this update, we added 18 new trials. Trials were published from 1981 to 2020. Trialists followed participants for periods ranging from 5 minutes to 12 months. The average age of participants ranged from 59 to 89 years. People with dementia were often excluded from the included trials. Additional analgesia was available for all participants. Results of 11 trials with 503 participants show that PNBs reduced pain on movement within 30 minutes of block placement (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.25 to -0.86; equivalent to -2.5 on a scale from 0 to 10; high-certainty evidence). Effect size was proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used (P = 0.0003). Based on 13 trials with 1072 participants, PNBs reduce the risk of acute confusional state (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.90; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 12, 95% CI 7 to 47; high-certainty evidence). For myocardial infarction, there were no events in one trial with 31 participants (RR not estimable; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 131 participants, PNBs probably reduce the risk for chest infection (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89; NNTB 7, 95% CI 5 to 72; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on 11 trials with 617 participants, the effects of PNBs on mortality within six months are uncertain due to very serious imprecision (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.60; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 208 participants, PNBs likely reduce time to first mobilization (mean difference (MD) -10.80 hours, 95% CI -12.83 to -8.77 hours; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial with 75 participants indicated there may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs with a single-injection PNB (MD -4.40 euros, 95% CI -4.84 to -3.96 euros; low-certainty evidence). We identified 29 ongoing trials, of which 15 were first posted or at least were last updated after 1 January 2018.  AUTHORS'

conclusionsPNBs reduce pain on movement within 30 minutes after block placement, risk of acute confusional state, and probably also reduce the risk of chest infection and time to first mobilization. There may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs for single-injection PNB. We did not find a difference for myocardial infarction and mortality, but the numbers of participants included for these two outcomes were insufficient. Although randomized clinical trials may not be the best way to establish risks associated with an intervention, our review confirms low risks of permanent injury associated with PNBs, as found by others. Some trials are ongoing, but it is unclear whether any further RCTs should be registered, given the benefits found. Good-quality non-randomized trials with appropriate sample size may help to clarify the potential effects of PNBs on myocardial infarction and mortality.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalConfusionEarly AmbulationFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementMyocardial InfarctionNerve BlockPain MeasurementPeripheral NervesAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID33238043
PMCPMC8130997
OpenAlexW3107002969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.