Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Blood pressure and bladder cancer risk in men by use of survival analysis and in interaction with NAT2 genotype, and by Mendelian randomization analysis.

Stanley Teleka, George Hindy, Isabel Drake, Alaitz Poveda, Olle Melander, Fredrik Liedberg, Marju Orho-Melander, Tanja Stocks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stanley TelekaDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9343-8399
George HindyDepartment of Population Medicine, College of Medicine Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-9299
Isabel DrakeDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Alaitz PovedaDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Olle MelanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik LiedbergDivision of Urological Research, Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Marju Orho-MelanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tanja StocksDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEBroad Institute · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between blood pressure (BP) and bladder cancer (BC) risk remains unclear with confounding by smoking being of particular concern. We investigated the association between BP and BC risk among men using conventional survival-analysis, and by Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis in an attempt to disconnect the association from smoking. We additionally investigated the interaction between BP and N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) rs1495741, an established BC genetic risk variant, in the association. Populations consisting of 188,167 men with 502 incident BC's in the UK-biobank and 27,107 men with 928 incident BC's in two Swedish cohorts were used for the analysis. We found a positive association between systolic BP and BC risk in Cox-regression survival analysis in the Swedish cohorts, (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation [SD]: 1.14 [95% confidence interval 1.05-1.22]) and MR analysis (odds ratio per SD: 2-stage least-square regression, 7.70 [1.92-30.9]; inverse-variance weighted estimate, 3.43 [1.12-10.5]), and no associations in the UK-biobank (HR systolic BP: 0.93 [0.85-1.02]; MR OR: 1.24 [0.35-4.40] and 1.37 [0.43-4.37], respectively). BP levels were positively associated with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) (HRs: systolic BP, 1.32 [1.09-1.59]; diastolic BP, 1.27 [1.04-1.55]), but not with non-muscle invasive BC, which could be analyzed in the Swedish cohorts only. There was no interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC on the additive or multiplicative scale. These results suggest that BP might be related to BC, more particularly MIBC. There was no evidence to support interaction between BP and NAT2 in relation to BC in our study.

Indexed as

AgedArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseBlood PressureFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSmokingSurvival AnalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseNAT2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33237904
PMCPMC7688142
OpenAlexW3108776487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.