Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237763›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2020

Purification of Recombinant α-synuclein: A Comparison of Commonly Used Protocols.

Amberley D Stephens, Dijana Matak-Vinkovic, Ana Fernandez-Villegas, Gabriele S Kaminski Schierle

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tracking proteasome degradation: A cross-organ analysis via intact degradomics mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amberley D StephensChemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-6392
Dijana Matak-VinkovicDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
Ana Fernandez-VillegasChemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.
Gabriele S Kaminski SchierleChemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-2202
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H023917/1Medical Research Council G0902243Medical Research Council MR/K02292X/1Medical Research Council MR/N012453/1Wellcome Trust 203249/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial state of the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein (aSyn), e.g., the presence of oligomers and degradation products, or the presence of contaminants and adducts can greatly influence the aggregation kinetics and toxicity of the protein. Here, we compare four commonly used protocols for the isolation of recombinant aSyn from

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinCell LineCell SurvivalChemical PrecipitationChromatography, GelChromatography, Ion ExchangeChromatography, LiquidEscherichia coliHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionProtein AggregatesProtein ConformationProtein Conformation, beta-StrandRecombinant ProteinsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionizationalpha-SynucleinIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein AggregatesRecombinant ProteinsSNCA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33237763
PMCPMC7818547
OpenAlexW3108086101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.