Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237505›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Treatment of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias: guidelines and current trends from the Herniamed Registry.

F Köckerling, W Brunner, R Fortelny, F Mayer, D Adolf, H Niebuhr, R Lorenz, W Reinpold, K Zarras, D Weyhe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07156188 (The PAPYRUS Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07156188 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The PAPYRUS Study: Permanent vs. Absorbable Sutures in PrimarY Repair of Umbilical HerniaS: A Multicentre, Single-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2026 to 2030Enrolled914ConditionsHernia Surgery, Umbilical Hernia RepairArmsPermanent Suture, Absorbable
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lessons learnt from the construction and implementation of a prospective ventral hernia database.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What is the reality in epigastric hernia repair?-a trend analysis from the Herniamed Registry.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  16. [Ventral hernias part 1 : Operative treatment techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F Köckerling *Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de.
W Brunner *Department of Surgery, Kantonspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Str. 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
R FortelnyDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
F MayerDepartment of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
D AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Halberstädter Strasse 40 a, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany.
H NiebuhrHansechirurgie, Niebuhr Marleschki & Partner, Alte Holstenstr. 16, 21031, Hamburg, Germany.
R LorenzHernia Center 3+CHIRURGEN, Klosterstrasse 34/35, 13581, Berlin, Germany.
W ReinpoldWilhelmsburger Hospital Gross-Sand, Gross-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany.
K ZarrasMarien Hospital Düsseldorf, Rochusstrasse 2, 40479, Düsseldorf, Germany.
D WeyheUniversity Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBased on meta-analyses and registry data, the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society have published guidelines for the treatment of umbilical hernias. These recommend that umbilical hernia should generally be treated by placing a non-absorbable (permanent) flat mesh into the preperitoneal space with an overlap of the hernia defect of 3 cm. Suture repair should only be considered for small hernia defects of less than 1 cm. Hence, the use of a mesh in general is subject to controversial debate particularly for small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. This analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry now presents data on the treatment of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias over the past 10 years.

methodsHerniamed is an Internet-based hernia registry in which hospitals and surgical centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland can voluntarily enter data on their routine hernia operations. Between 2010 and 2019, data were entered into the Herniamed Registry by 737 hospitals/surgery centers on a total of 111,765 patients with primary elective umbilical hernia repair. The prospective data were analyzed retrospectively for each year and statistically compared. Due to a higher number of cases, the years 2013 and 2019 were compared for the perioperative outcome and the years 2013 and 2018 for 1-year follow-up. Fisher's exact test was applied for unadjusted analyses between the years, using a significance level of alpha = 5%. For post hoc tests of single categories, a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing was implemented.

resultsA mesh technique was used to treat 45.4% of all umbilical hernias. The proportion of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias in the total collective of umbilical hernias was 55.6%. Suture repair was used consistently over the 10-year period to treat around 75% of all small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. Preperitoneal mesh placement as recommended in the guidelines was used only in 1.8% of cases. Between 2013 and 2019, stable values of 2 and 0.7% were observed for the postoperative complications and complication-related reoperations, respectively, with no relevant effect identified for the surgical technique. At 1-year follow-up, significantly higher rates of pain at rest (2.6 vs. 3.3), pain on exertion (5.7 vs. 6.6), and recurrences (1.3 vs. 1.8) (all p < 0.05) were identified for 2018 compared with 2013.

conclusionsA suture technique is still used to treat 75% of patients with small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. The pain and recurrence rates are significantly less favorable for 2018 compared with 2013.

Indexed as

Hernia, UmbilicalHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshChronic painComplicationsMesh repairRecurrenceSuture repairUmbilical hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.