ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021
Treatment of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias: guidelines and current trends from the Herniamed Registry.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07156188 (The PAPYRUS Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The PAPYRUS Study: Permanent vs. Absorbable Sutures in PrimarY Repair of Umbilical HerniaS: A Multicentre, Single-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Chronic pain and foreign body sensation based on mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review highlighting the evidence gap and a call to action.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Does closure of the direct hernia defect in laparoscopic inguinal herniotomy reduce the risk of recurrence and seroma formation?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- A comparison of outcomes between patients with class I and class II obesity undergoing umbilical hernia repair: a multicenter study using the ACQHC database.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- To drain or not to drain in minimal invasive ventral hernia surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of eTEP and IPOM for ventral hernia surgery in the early postoperative period: a retrospective cohort study of a tertiary university centre.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Lessons learnt from the construction and implementation of a prospective ventral hernia database.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- [Roboticassisted incisional hernia surgery-Retromuscular techniques].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Gender differences in epigastric hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis of 15,925 patients from the Herniamed registry.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- Practice and short-term outcomes in ventral hernia repair: a prospective multicenter data audit of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons Research Collaborative.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Multicenter analysis of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair with mesh: outcomes and quality of life (QoL).Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Editorial: Mesh Complications in Hernia Surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Subxiphoid top-down endoscopic totally preperitoneal approach (eTPA) for midline ventral hernia repair.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- What is the reality in epigastric hernia repair?-a trend analysis from the Herniamed Registry.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
- [Ventral hernias part 1 : Operative treatment techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
- Assessment of potential influencing factors on the outcome in small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 31,965 patients.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBased on meta-analyses and registry data, the European Hernia Society and the Americas Hernia Society have published guidelines for the treatment of umbilical hernias. These recommend that umbilical hernia should generally be treated by placing a non-absorbable (permanent) flat mesh into the preperitoneal space with an overlap of the hernia defect of 3 cm. Suture repair should only be considered for small hernia defects of less than 1 cm. Hence, the use of a mesh in general is subject to controversial debate particularly for small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. This analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry now presents data on the treatment of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias over the past 10 years.
methodsHerniamed is an Internet-based hernia registry in which hospitals and surgical centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland can voluntarily enter data on their routine hernia operations. Between 2010 and 2019, data were entered into the Herniamed Registry by 737 hospitals/surgery centers on a total of 111,765 patients with primary elective umbilical hernia repair. The prospective data were analyzed retrospectively for each year and statistically compared. Due to a higher number of cases, the years 2013 and 2019 were compared for the perioperative outcome and the years 2013 and 2018 for 1-year follow-up. Fisher's exact test was applied for unadjusted analyses between the years, using a significance level of alpha = 5%. For post hoc tests of single categories, a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing was implemented.
resultsA mesh technique was used to treat 45.4% of all umbilical hernias. The proportion of small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias in the total collective of umbilical hernias was 55.6%. Suture repair was used consistently over the 10-year period to treat around 75% of all small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. Preperitoneal mesh placement as recommended in the guidelines was used only in 1.8% of cases. Between 2013 and 2019, stable values of 2 and 0.7% were observed for the postoperative complications and complication-related reoperations, respectively, with no relevant effect identified for the surgical technique. At 1-year follow-up, significantly higher rates of pain at rest (2.6 vs. 3.3), pain on exertion (5.7 vs. 6.6), and recurrences (1.3 vs. 1.8) (all p < 0.05) were identified for 2018 compared with 2013.
conclusionsA suture technique is still used to treat 75% of patients with small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernias. The pain and recurrence rates are significantly less favorable for 2018 compared with 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33237505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.