Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237462›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Shigeoki Hayashi, Tadatoshi Takayama, Masahito Ikarashi, Ken Hagiwara, Yoritaka Matsuno, Takeki Suzuki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Robotic TAMIS rectal neuroendocrine tumor excision.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shigeoki HayashiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. hayashi.shigeoki@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8144-5735
Tadatoshi TakayamaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Masahito IkarashiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Ken HagiwaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Yoritaka MatsunoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Takeki SuzukiDepartment of Surgery, Toride-Kitasouma Medical Association Hospital, 1926 Nonoi, Toride, Ibaraki, 302-0032, Japan.
Nihon University · JPJA Toride Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no literature that mainly searched for rectal neuroendocrine tumor (rNET) using transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS). We report our clinical experiences of TAMIS for rectal neuroendocrine tumors to evaluate the feasibility and safety.

methodsBetween December 2010 and March 2020, the 25 consecutive patients with rectal neoplasma underwent the TAMIS procedure performed by single laparoscopic surgeon at the two hospitals. Of these, ten patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors were reviewed retrospectively. The full-thickness excision down to the outer fatty tissues was completed using TAMIS technique. Clinicopathological findings, perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

resultsTAMIS for small rNET was successfully completed in all cases. There were seven cases with a tumor size of less than 10 mm, and three cases with a tumor size between 10 and 15 mm. Six patients underwent the primary tumor excision; the remaining four patients underwent resection for the scar after endoscopic procedure. The median surgical duration was 80.5 (53-124) minutes and the median blood loss was 1 (1-12) ml. All removed tumors in the 6 primary excisions were diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumor G1. The margins of specimens were completely free in all cases. Among the four patients after endoscopic procedure, all had no histological evidence of residual tumor. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days postoperatively. There was no post-operative mortality or severe complication. The median length of observation was 54 months. No recurrence, no local or distant metastasis and no mortality of all patients were observed.

conclusionsTAMIS is safety and feasible procedure for small rNET. Further experience and clinical trials are needed to fully define the advantages, disadvantages, and indications of TAMIS for rNET.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsRectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRectumRetrospective StudiesRectal neuroendocrine tumorsSILSTEMTransanal minimal invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID33237462
OpenAlexW3109889039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.