Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237367›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Diabetic foot syndrome-Part 2 : Revascularization, treatment alternatives, care structures, recurrency prophylaxis].

G Rümenapf, S Morbach, U Rother, C Uhl, H Görtz, D Böckler, C A Behrendt, D Hochlenert, G Engels, A Hohneck and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

G RümenapfOberrheinisches Gefäßzentrum Speyer, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Paul-Egell-Straße 33, 67346, Speyer, Deutschland. gerhard.ruemenapf@diakonissen.de.
S MorbachAbteilung Diabetologie und Angiologie, Fachbereich , Innere Medizin, Marienkrankenhaus gGmbH Soest, Soest, Deutschland.
U RotherGefäßchirurgische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
C UhlKlinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
H GörtzKlinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Lingen, Deutschland.
D BöcklerKlinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C A BehrendtKlinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
D HochlenertCentrum für Diabetologie, Endoskopie und Wundheilung Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
G EngelsChirurgische Praxis am Bayenthalgürtel, Köln, Deutschland.
A HohneckAbteilung für Angiologie, 1. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.
M SiglAbteilung für Angiologie, 1. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Kommission PAVK und Diabetisches Fußsyndrom der DGG e. V.
Heidelberg University · DEDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEOrthopädische Praxis · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is the most frequent reason for major amputations in Germany. The majority of foot lesions are triggered by repetitive pressure in diabetic polyneuropathy. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) impairs wound healing and is the main risk factor for amputations. The treatment of wounds and infections as well as timely revascularization are decisive. The use of endovascular and vascular surgical methods depends on the distribution pattern and length of the occlusion processes. Both procedures are complementary. Bypass surgery is of great importance for neuroischemic DFS. Multidisciplinary centers that provide revascularization in DFS can achieve an improvement of arterial blood flow in 90% of the cases and reduce the amputation rate by up to 80%. Due to the high recurrence rate of diabetic foot lesions, measures for secondary prophylaxis are of exceptional importance (podological and orthopedic technical care, foot surgery).

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAmputation, SurgicalGermanyHumansLimb SalvageTreatment OutcomeVascular Surgical ProceduresWound HealingFoot surgeryPeripheral arterial occlusive diseaseSecondary prophylaxisVascular surgeryWound treatment

Identifiers

PMID33237367
PMCPMC7875854
OpenAlexW3107096933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.