Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33237357›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2021

Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Eoin MacCraith, Eoghan M Cunnane, Michael Joyce, James C Forde, Fergal J O'Brien, Niall F Davis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of British Columbia practice patterns in the management of female stress urinary incontinence with emphasis on mesh use.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Endometrial SUSD2Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eoin MacCraithRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland. eoinmaccraith@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5814-0722
Eoghan M CunnaneRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael JoyceRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
James C FordeRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Fergal J O'BrienRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Niall F DavisRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Tissue Engineering Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

RCSI StAR MD Programme 20224A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to systematically compare rates of erosion and chronic pain after mesh insertion for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery.

methodsA systematic electronic search was performed on studies that evaluated the incidence of erosion and chronic pain after mesh insertion for POP or SUI. The primary outcome measurement was to compare mesh erosion rates for POP and SUI surgery. Secondary outcome measurements were incidence of de novo pain and a comparison of patient demographics for both surgeries.

resultsTwenty-six studies on 292,606 patients (n = 9077 for POP surgery and n = 283,529 for SUI surgery) met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 26.38 ± 22.17 months for POP surgery and 39.33 ± 27.68 months for SUI surgery. Overall, the POP group were older (p < 0.0001) and had a lower BMI (p < 0.0001). Mesh erosion rates were significantly greater in the POP group compared to the SUI group (4% versus 1.9%) (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.91-2.37; p < 0.0001). The duration from surgery to onset of mesh erosion was 306.84 ± 183.98 days. There was no difference in erosion rates between abdominal and transvaginal mesh for POP. There was no difference in erosion rates between the transobturator and retropubic approach for SUI. The incidence of chronic pain was significantly greater in the POP group compared to the SUI group (6.7% versus 0.6%) (OR 11.02; 95% CI 8.15-14.9; p < 0.0001). The duration from surgery to onset of chronic pain was 325.88 ± 226.31 days.

conclusionsThe risk of mesh erosion and chronic pain is significantly higher after surgery for POP compared to SUI. These significant complications occur within the first year after surgery.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPelvic Organ ProlapseSuburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressHumansSurgical MeshChronic painErosionExposureMeshPelvic organ prolapsePolypropyleneSlingStress urinary incontinenceTape

Identifiers

PMID33237357
OpenAlexW3109757870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.