ReviewMagnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America2021
Progress in Imaging the Human Torso at the Ultrahigh Fields of 7 and 10.5 T.
Review in Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2026Review
- A Numerical Alternative to MR Thermometry for Safety Validation of Multi-Channel RF Transmit Coils.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A 128-channel receive array with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio performance for 10.5T brain imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Local and whole-body SAR in UHF body imaging: Implications for SAR matrix compression.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- RF coil design strategies for improving SNR at the ultrahigh magnetic field of 10.5T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- 3D Metamaterials Facilitate Human Cardiac MRI at 21.0 Tesla: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of receive head arrays versus ultimate intrinsic SNR at 7 T and 10.5 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- ImprovedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Germany's journey toward 14 Tesla human magnetic resonance.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Radiofrequency antenna concepts for human cardiac MR at 14.0 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Scaling the mountains: what lies above 7 Tesla magnetic resonance?Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Improved TSE imaging at ultrahigh field using nonlocalized efficiency RF shimming and acquisition modes optimized for refocused echoes (AMORE).Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- A nine-channel transmit/receive array for spine imaging at 10.5 T: Introduction to a nonuniform dielectric substrate antenna.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Especially after the launch of 7 T, the ultrahigh magnetic field (UHF) imaging community achieved critically important strides in our understanding of the physics of radiofrequency interactions in the human body, which in turn has led to solutions for the challenges posed by such UHFs. As a result, the originally obtained poor image quality has progressed to the high-quality and high-resolution images obtained at 7 T and now at 10.5 T in the human torso. Despite these tremendous advances, work still remains to further improve the image quality and fully capitalize on the potential advantages UHF has to offer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.