Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236973›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2020

Priority-setting to integrate sexual and reproductive health into universal health coverage: the case of Malaysia.

Shiang Cheng Lim, Yee Chern Yap, Sima Barmania, Veloshnee Govender, Georges Danhoundo, Michelle Remme

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shiang Cheng LimCountry Technical Lead, Better Health Programme Malaysia, RTI International Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia/Post-doctoral Fellow, International Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Yee Chern YapResearch Intern, International Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sima BarmaniaConsultant, International Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Veloshnee GovenderScientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Georges DanhoundoScientist, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michelle RemmeResearch Lead, International Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health · MYWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing calls to integrate and prioritise sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in universal health coverage (UHC) processes, several SRH services have remained a low priority in countries' UHC plans. This study aims to understand the priority-setting process of SRH interventions in the context of UHC, drawing on the Malaysian experience. A realist evaluation framework was adopted to examine the priority-setting process for three SRH tracer interventions: pregnancy, safe delivery and post-natal care; gender-based violence (GBV) services; and abortion-related services. The study used a qualitative multi-method design, including a literature and document review, and 20 in-depth key informant interviews, to explore the context-mechanism-outcome configurations that influenced and explained the priority-setting process. Four key advocacy strategies were identified for the effective prioritisation of SRH services, namely: (1) generating public demand and social support, (2) linking SRH issues with public agendas or international commitments, (3) engaging champions that are internal and external to the public health sector, and (4) reframing SRH issues as public health issues. While these strategies successfully triggered mechanisms, such as mutual understanding and increased buy-in of policymakers to prioritise SRH services, the level and extent of prioritisation was affected by both inner and outer contextual factors, in particular the socio-cultural and political context. Priority-setting is a political decision-making process that reflects societal values and norms. Efforts to integrate SRH services in UHC processes need both to make technical arguments and to find strategies to overcome barriers related to societal values (including certain socio-cultural and religious norms). This is particularly important for sensitive SRH services, like GBV and safe abortion, and for certain populations.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesHealth Services AccessibilityReproductive Health ServicesHumansMalaysiaPolicy MakingPoliticsQualitative ResearchReproductive HealthSexual HealthSocial ValuesStrategic PlanningUniversal Health Insuranceabortioncontext–mechanism–outcomegender-based violence (GBV)pregnancypriority-settingsafe delivery and post-natal caresexual and reproductive healthuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID33236973
PMCPMC7887985
OpenAlexW3108377309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.