Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236937›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

The effect of visual uncertainty on implicit motor adaptation.

Jonathan S Tsay, Guy Avraham, Hyosub E Kim, Darius E Parvin, Zixuan Wang, Richard B Ivry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Attention Defines the Context for Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A cerebellar population coding model for sensorimotor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan S TsayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-9023
Guy AvrahamDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-1041
Hyosub E KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-593X
Darius E ParvinDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5278-2970
Zixuan WangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-2233
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Specifying the constraints on cerebellar dependent sensorimotor adaptationR01NS105839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2018 to 2019
$709k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105839NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by both the size and variance of error information. In the present study, we varied visual uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner and evaluated their joint effect on adaptation, using a feedback method that avoids inherent limitations with standard visuomotor tasks. Uncertainty attenuated adaptation, but only when the error was small. This striking interaction highlights a novel constraint for models of sensorimotor adaptation. Sensorimotor adaptation is driven by sensory prediction errors, the difference between the predicted and actual feedback. When the position of the feedback is made uncertain, motor adaptation is attenuated. This effect, in the context of optimal sensory integration models, has been attributed to the motor system discounting noisy feedback and thus reducing the learning rate. In its simplest form, optimal integration predicts that uncertainty would result in reduced learning for all error sizes. However, these predictions remain untested since manipulations of error size in standard visuomotor tasks introduce confounds in the degree to which performance is influenced by other learning processes such as strategy use. Here, we used a novel visuomotor task that isolates the contribution of implicit adaptation, independent of error size. In two experiments, we varied feedback uncertainty and error size in a factorial manner. At odds with the basic predictions derived from the optimal integration theory, the results show that uncertainty attenuated learning only when the error size was small but had no effect when the error size was large. We discuss possible mechanisms that may account for this interaction, considering how uncertainty may interact with the relevance assigned to the error signal or how the output of the adaptation system in terms of recalibrating the sensorimotor map may be modified by uncertainty.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalVisual PerceptionAdolescentFemaleHumansLearningMalePsychomotor PerformanceSensorimotor CortexUncertaintyYoung Adultcerebellumerror-based learningsensorimotor adaptationsensory integration

Identifiers

PMID33236937
PMCPMC8087384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.