ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2020
Quantitative
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Cell Dissection of Dimethomorph-Induced Neurotoxicity in the Gestational Brain: Metabolic Disruption and Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Review
- In vitro confirmation of estrogenic and antiandrogenic pesticide bioactivity using schild regression analysis.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2025Article
- Cross-species comparisons of plasma binding and considerations for data evaluation.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2025Article
- Assessment of Potential Toxic Effects of Fungicide Fludioxonil on Human Cells and Aquatic Microorganisms.Toxics · 2025Article
- Advancing Toxicity Predictions: A Review onEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Review
- New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!Environment international · 2023Review
- New Approach Methodologies for the Endocrine Activity Toolbox: Environmental Assessment for Fish and Amphibians.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2023Review
- Human risk associated with exposure to mixtures of antiandrogenic chemicals evaluated using in vitro hazard and human biomonitoring data.Environment international · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation and comparison of in vitro intrinsic clearance rates measured using cryopreserved hepatocytes from humans, rats, and rainbow trout.Toxicology · 2021Article
- On the Use and Interpretation of Areola/Nipple Retention as a Biomarker for Anti-androgenic Effects in Rat Toxicity Studies.Frontiers in toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany pesticides can antagonize the androgen receptor (AR) or inhibit androgen synthesis
objectivesThe aim was to develop a quantitative
methodsWe built a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBK) model to simulate concentrations of chemicals in the fetus resulting from maternal dosing. The predicted fetal levels were compared with analytically determined concentrations, and these were judged against
resultsWe first evaluated our model by using DISCUSSION: Our QIVIVE model newly identified fludioxonil, cyprodinil, and dimethomorph as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.