Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236851›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2021

A relational database within the Leg Club Network: an audit.

Neil McIntyre, Anna Milena Galazka, Ellie Lindsay, Robert Bawden, Roland Renyi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neil McIntyreTrustee, The Lindsay Leg Club Foundation, Ipswich, UK.
Anna Milena GalazkaPost-doctoral research consultant, Welsh Wound Innovation Centre, Pontyclun in collaboration with Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4376-1980
Ellie LindsayIndependent Specialist Practitioner, The Lindsay Leg Club Foundation, Ipswich, UK.
Robert BawdenTrustee, The Lindsay Leg Club Foundation, Ipswich, UK.
Roland RenyiRetired chairman, The Lindsay Leg Club Foundation, Ipswich, UK.
The Lindsay Leg Club Foundation · GBQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing prevalence of venous leg ulcers in an ageing population presents challenges for wound care and management. The Lindsay Leg Club model is an alternative approach to the management of leg health that can improve patient outcomes. This article reports on an audit of a relational database located within the Leg Club Network, containing records of more than 17 000 patients (known as members) who attended a Leg Club in a 5-year period (2014-2019). Overall, over 266 000 member leg assessments and treatments were entered into the database. The average nurse-member attendance time was 28 min, with a skill mix of 23% senior nurses, 70% qualified and associate nurses, and 7% nurses in supervisory roles. Healing rates averaged 62% after 12 weeks. Recurrence rates were 20% after 12 weeks. Annual clinical and volunteer hours averaged 821 and 800 h, respectively. Staffing costs were £28 per wound treatment or leg assessment with a typical duration of 27 min; 71% of members were aged 70 to 94 years old, which indicates the need for a service that caters to the specific requirements of this age group. However, no data on psychosocial and well-being outcomes were recorded. Their inclusion in further developments of this database is recommended.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualLeg UlcerVaricose UlcerWound HealingAgedAged, 80 and overHumansLegMedical AuditRecurrencedatabaseevidence-based wound careleg ulcersLindsay Leg Clubspsychosocial model of care

Identifiers

PMID33236851
PMCPMC8244080
OpenAlexW3107945330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.