ArticleHuman brain mapping2021
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive science theory-driven pharmacology elucidates the neurobiological basis of perception-motor integration.Communications biology · 2022Trial
- Article
- Neural dynamics underlying coordination between training-induced habitual and goal-directed responses.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Revealing the different levels of action monitoring in visuomotor transformation task: Evidence from decomposition of cortical potentials.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Response-Response Binding: New Evidence from Event-Related Potentials Data.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- It's not distance but similarity of distance: changing stimulus relations affect the control of action sequences.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Response stopping under conflict: The integrative role of representational dynamics associated with the insular cortex.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Modality-specific and modality-independent neural representations work in concert in predictive processes during sequence learning.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Unsigned surprise but not reward magnitude modulates the integration of motor elements during actions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Theta Activity Dynamics during Embedded Response Plan Processing in Tourette Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- The role of visual association cortices during response selection processes in interference-modulated response stopping.Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Article
- A ventral stream-prefrontal cortex processing cascade enables working memory gating dynamics.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Protocol to decode representations from EEG data with intermixed signals using temporal signal decomposition and multivariate pattern-analysis.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Neural correlates of abnormal cognitive conflict resolution in major depression: An event-related potential study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Information transmission in action video gaming experts: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor feature binding processes and representations.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coherent, voluntary action requires an integrated representation of these actions and their defining features. Although theories delineate how action integration requiring binding between different action features may be accomplished, the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms are largely elusive. The present study examined the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying binding processes in actions. To this end, we conducted EEG recordings and applied standard event-related potential analyses, temporal EEG signal decomposition and multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA). According to the code occupation account, an overlap between a planned and a to-be-performed action impairs performance. The level, to which performance is attenuated depends on the strength of binding of action features. This binding process then determines the representation of them, the so-called action files. We show that code occupation and bindings between action features specifically modulate processes preceding motor execution as showed by the stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Conversely, motor execution processes reflected by the response-locked LRP were not modulated by action file binding. The temporal decomposition of the EEG signal, further distinguished between action file related processes: the planned response determining code occupation was reflected in general (voluntary) response selection but not in involuntary (response priming-related) activation. Moreover, MVPA on temporally decomposed neural signals indicated that action files are represented as a continuous chain of activations. Within this chain, inhibitory and response re-activation patterns can be distinguished. Taken together, the neurophysiological correlates of action file binding suggest that parallel, stimulus- and response-related pre-motor processes are responsible for the code occupation in the human motor system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.