Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236687›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2021

Intracranial aneurysms managed by parent artery reconstruction using Tubridge: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, post-market clinical trial.

Qiaowei Wu, Li Li, Qiuji Shao, Tianming Xu, Kaitao Chang, Tianxiao Li, Yingkun He

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiaowei WuDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Li LiDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiuji ShaoDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Tianming XuDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Kaitao ChangDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Tianxiao LiDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.
Yingkun HeDepartment of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cerebrovascular Disease and Henan Engineering Research Center of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4168-8158
Henan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a new endovascular reconstruction technique, flow diverter (FD) shows excellent efficacy and safety for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In a previous multicenter, randomized, controlled, pre-market study, Tubridge FD showed remarkably higher complete occlusion rate compared with traditional stent-assisted coiling. However, a nonsignificant higher complication rate in the Tubridge group was noted. Considering the learning curve, the safety, and long-term outcomes of Tubridge FD should be verified in new prospective, real world, multicenter, post-market trials.

methodsThis study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market clinical trial that evaluates the safety and efficacy of Tubridge in the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms by reconstructing parent artery. We expect 200 participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria to be included. Clinical information and angiographic results (Raymond-Roy grading scale, RRGS) will be recorded objectively. The primary endpoint will be the complete occlusion rate of the target aneurysm (RRGS 1) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints will include the adequate occlusion rate (RRGS 1 & 2) and the rate of major in-stent stenosis (>50%) at 12-month follow-up, technique success rate, changes of modified Rankin Scale before and after the procedure, the rate of aneurysm related disability, neurological mortality, and all-cause mortality within follow-up period. DISCUSSION: This post-market, prospective trial may offer more information on the safety and long-term outcomes of Tubridge FD. When the study is complete, the results may provide us a new strategy for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmArteriesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStentsTreatment OutcomeFlow diverterintracranial aneurysmTrialTubridge

Identifiers

PMID33236687
PMCPMC8580545
OpenAlexW3107475336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.