ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021
Clinically Available Software for Automatic Brain Volumetry: Comparisons of Volume Measurements and Validation of Intermethod Reliability.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- Validation of Compressed Sensing Accelerated Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo for Fast and Reliable Brain Volume Measurement.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Four Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Software for Brain Volumetry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hippocampal volume from T1 MRI as an atrophy biomarker: automated calculation and Scheltens' scale correlation.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- A FastSurfer Database for Age-Specific Brain Volumes in Healthy Children: A Tool for Quantifying Localized and Global Brain Volume Alterations in Pediatric Patients.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Volumetry of Selected Brain Regions-Can We Compare MRI Examinations of Different Manufacturers and Field Strengths?Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Reliability of brain volume measures of accelerated 3D T1-weighted images with deep learning-based reconstruction.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Evaluating brain volume segmentation accuracy and reliability of FreeSurfer and Neurophet AQUA at variations in MRI magnetic field strengths.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of Inter-Method Agreement and Reliability for Automatic Brain Volumetry Using Three Different Clinically Available Software Packages.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Contrast-enhanced to non-contrast-enhanced image translation to exploit a clinical data warehouse of T1-weighted brain MRI.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Automated brain segmentation and volumetry in dementia diagnostics: a narrative review with emphasis on FreeSurfer.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Magnetic resonance image-based brain age as a discriminator of dementia conversion in patients with amyloid-negative amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Reliability of automated brain volumetric analysis: A test by comparing NeuroQuant and volBrain software.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Comparison of Normative Percentiles of Brain Volume Obtained from NeuroQuantJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Article
- Brain Parcellation Repeatability and Reproducibility Using Conventional and Quantitative 3D MR Imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Development and validation of deep learning-based automatic brain segmentation for East Asians: A comparison with Freesurfer.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Agreement and Reliability between Clinically Available Software Programs in Measuring Volumes and Normative Percentiles of Segmented Brain Regions.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Article
- [Brain MRI-Based Artificial Intelligence Software in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases: Current Status].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuantFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare two clinically available MR volumetry software, NeuroQuant® (NQ) and Inbrain® (IB), and examine the inter-method reliabilities and differences between them. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 172 subjects (age range, 55-88 years; mean age, 71.2 years), comprising 45 normal healthy subjects, 85 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 42 patients with Alzheimer's disease. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed with IB and NQ. Mean differences were compared with the paired t test. Inter-method reliability was evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Effect sizes were also obtained to document the standardized mean differences.
resultsThe paired t test showed significant volume differences in most regions except for the amygdala between the two methods. Nevertheless, inter-method measurements between IB and NQ showed good to excellent reliability (0.72 <
conclusionComparisons between IB and NQ showed significantly different volume measurements with large effect sizes. However, they showed good to excellent inter-method reliability in volumetric measurements for all brain regions, with the exception of the pallidum. Clinicians using these commercial software should take into consideration that different volume measurements could be obtained depending on the software used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.