Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236410›Full record

Trial reportHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2021

Long-term safety and efficacy of emicizumab for up to 5.8 years and patients' perceptions of symptoms and daily life: A phase 1/2 study in patients with severe haemophilia A.

Midori Shima, Azusa Nagao, Masashi Taki, Tadashi Matsushita, Koichi Oshida, Kagehiro Amano, Sayaka Nagami, Norihiro Okada, Shingo Maisawa, Keiji Nogami

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Emicizumab dose up-titration in case of suboptimal bleeding control in people with haemophilia A.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2023
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Review
  14. The dosing conundrum of emicizumab: To waste product or not?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Midori ShimaDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5922-7061
Azusa NagaoDepartment of Blood Coagulation, Ogikubo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi TakiDepartment of Pediatrics, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Tadashi MatsushitaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Koichi OshidaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kagehiro AmanoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sayaka NagamiChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-3237
Norihiro OkadaChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo MaisawaChugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Keiji NogamiDepartment of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-2194
Nara Medical University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPOgikubo Hospital · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTokyo Medical University · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSafety and efficacy results of the phase 1 study and phase 1/2 extension study of the bispecific antibody emicizumab in patients with severe haemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors for up to 2.8 years were reported previously.

aimTo evaluate further longer-term data including patients' perceptions at study completion.

methodsEmicizumab was administered subcutaneously once weekly at maintenance doses of 0.3, 1 or 3 mg/kg with potential up-titration. All patients were later switched to the approved maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg.

resultsEighteen patients received emicizumab for up to 5.8 years. Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to emicizumab. Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for bleeds treated with coagulation factors decreased from pre-emicizumab rates or remained zero in all patients. The median ABRs were low at 1.25, 0.83 and 0.22 during the 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg dosing periods, respectively. Of 8 patients who decreased their doses from 3 to 1.5 mg/kg, ABRs decreased in 4, remained at zero in 2, and increased in 2. Total time spent with symptoms associated with treated bleeds decreased in all patients except 2. All patients answered 'improved' for bleeding severity and time until bleeding stops, except 1 answering 'slightly improved'. Most patients answered 'improved' or 'slightly improved'' for daily life and feelings; in particular, all patients except 1 answered 'improved' or 'slightly improved' for anxiety.

conclusionsLong-term emicizumab prophylaxis for up to 5.8 years was safe and efficacious, and may improve patients' daily lives and feelings, regardless of inhibitor status.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificHemophilia AAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansPerceptionAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedemicizumabbispecific antibodyclinical trialemicizumabhaemophilia Along-term observationprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID33236410
PMCPMC7894561
OpenAlexW3110070838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.