Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236373›Full record

Observational studyArtificial organs2021

Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically Ill COVID-19 patients and predictors of mortality.

Rashad Zayat, Sebastian Kalverkamp, Oliver Grottke, Koray Durak, Michael Dreher, Rüdiger Autschbach, Gernot Marx, Nikolaus Marx, Jan Spillner, Alex Kersten

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Artificial organs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Research progress on the pathogenesis of AKI complicated by ECMO.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashad ZayatDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-8743
Sebastian KalverkampDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Oliver GrottkeDepartment of Anesthesiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Koray DurakDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Michael DreherDepartment of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Rüdiger AutschbachDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Gernot MarxDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Nikolaus MarxDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jan SpillnerDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Alex KerstenDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the management of critically ill COVID-19 patients remains unclear. Our study aims to analyze the outcomes and risk factors from patients treated with ECMO. This retrospective, single-center study includes 17 COVID-19 patients treated with ECMO. Univariate and multivariate parametric survival regression identified predictors of survival. Nine patients (53%) were successfully weaned from ECMO and discharged. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was 47%. In a univariate analysis, only four out of 83 pre-ECMO variables were significantly different; IL-6, PCT, and NT-proBNP were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score was significantly higher in survivors. After a multivariate parametric survival regression, IL-6, NT-proBNP and RESP scores remained significant independent predictors, with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.069 [95%-CI: 0.986-1.160], P = .016 1.001 [95%-CI: 1.000-1.001], P = .012; and .843 [95%-CI: 0.564-1.260], P = .040, respectively. A prediction model comprising IL-6, NT-proBNP, and RESP score showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and 77.8% specificity compared to an AUC of 0.79 for the RESP score alone. The present study suggests that ECMO is a potentially lifesaving treatment for selected critically ill COVID-19 patients. Considering IL-6 and NT-pro-BNP, in addition to the RESP score, may enhance outcome predictions.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationBiomarkersCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, ViralPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Survival RateBiomarkersAcute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19critical careextra corporeal membrane oxygenationrisk factorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33236373
PMCPMC7753822
OpenAlexW3108389911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.