ArticleJournal of ultrasound2021
Medical imaging community outreach program: lesson to students and impact to the community.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe community outreach program is one of the main activities of the University of Rwanda, and both staff and students get involved in this tremendous initiative to serve the community free of charge. PURPOSE: The main objectives of this community engagement activity were to raise awareness of medical imaging services and abdominal ultrasound screening.
methodsThe project proposal was planned by the Medical Imaging Department, University of Rwanda College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Remera Campus. It took place at Kigali's main car park. Two ultrasound machines were used, and screening was done by students under supervision of registered sonographers. A cross-sectional design with random sampling was employed, and SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis. Statistical techniques were used to calculate inter-observer reliability by comparing patient complaints and sonographic diagnosis.
resultsHerein we report the first medical imaging community outreach, on which 86 patients received ultrasound abdominal scans free of charge. Of these, 33 (38.5%) were male and 53 (61.5%) were female. Their ages varied from 20 to 76 years, with a mean age of 48. The screened organs included the liver, gall bladder, pancreas, spleen, kidneys, urinary bladder, prostate, uterus and ovaries, and abnormalities were identified in different organs. The results showed a high degree of reliability between what was presented by the patients and measurements found after diagnosis by the sonographer. The average measure of the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.973, with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 0.959 to 0.983 (F (85,85) = 37.537, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis experience was beneficial to the Medical Imaging Sciences Department staff and students, as well as to the Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation in Rwanda. The results showed that this outreach was also very positive for the community at large.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.