Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236195›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Real-world bone turnover marker use: impact on treatment decisions and fracture.

N E Lane, K Saag, T J O'Neill, M Manion, R Shah, U Klause, R Eastell

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone health in patients with cancer: a SEOM-SEIOMM consensus review of risk factors, assessment strategies, and management approaches.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

N E LaneDepartment of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. nelane@ucdavis.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-2198
K SaagDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-8078
T J O'NeillData Science and Services, Diagnostics Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Belmont, CA, USA.
M ManionRoche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R ShahData Science and Services, Diagnostics Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Belmont, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-820X
U KlauseRoche Diabetes Care, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R EastellMetabolic Bone Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-3366
Roche (United States) · USNorthern General Hospital · GBUC Davis Health · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of bone turnover marker (BTM) testing for patients with osteoporosis in the USA has not been well characterized. This retrospective US-based real-world data study found BTM testing has some association with treatment decision-making and lower fracture risk in patients with presumed osteoporosis, supporting its use in clinical practice.

introductionThe purpose of this study was to characterize bone turnover marker (BTM) testing patterns and estimate their clinical utility in treatment decision-making and fragility fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis using a retrospective claims database.

methodsData from patients aged ≥ 50 years with newly diagnosed osteoporosis enrolled in the Truven MarketScan

resultsOf the 457,829 patients with osteoporosis, 6075 were identified with ≥ 1 BTM test following diagnosis; of these patients, 1345 had a unique treatment decision made ≤ 30 days from BTM testing. The percentage of patients receiving BTM tests increased significantly each year (average annual % change: + 8.1%; 95% CI: 5.6-9.0; p = 0.01). Patients tested were significantly more likely to have a treatment decision (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.13-1.15), and testing was associated with lower odds of fracture versus those untested (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.88).

conclusionIn this large, heterogeneous population of patients with presumed osteoporosis, BTM testing was associated with treatment decision-making, likely leading to fragility fracture reduction following use.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneOsteoporosisAgedBiomarkersBone DensityBone RemodelingHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsBiochemical markersBone turnoverFracture riskMonitoring treatmentOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID33236195
PMCPMC8043891
OpenAlexW3107343092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.