ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2020
Measuring compressibility in the optima AUC™ analytical ultracentrifuge.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adsorption of Au(III), Pt(IV), Pd(II), and Rh(III) ions on activated carbon in a batch reactor supported by microwave radiation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analytical ultracentrifugation: still the gold standard that offers multiple solutions.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A method is described to accurately measure the compressibility of liquids using an analytical ultracentrifuge. The method makes use of very large pressure gradients, which can be generated in the analytical ultracentrifuge at high speeds to induce a maximum compression signal. Taking advantage of the new Optima AUC, which offers 10 micron radial resolution, a novel calibration centerpiece for measuring rotor stretch, and a speed-ramping procedure, even the weak compressibility of liquids like water, typically considered to be incompressible, could be detected. A model using the standard expression for the secant-average bulk modulus describing the relative compression of a liquid in the analytical ultracentrifuge is derived. The model is a function of the loading volume and the hydrostatic pressure generated in the analytical ultracentrifuge, as well as the secant-average bulk modulus. The compressibility of water and toluene were measured and the linear secant-average bulk modulus and meniscus positions were fitted. In addition to the measurement of the compressibility of liquids, applications for this method include an improved prediction of boundary conditions for multi-speed analytical ultracentrifugation experiments to better describe highly heterogeneous systems with analytical speed-ramping procedures, and the prediction of radius-dependent density variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.