Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236034›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020

Development and validation of a highly sensitive and specific electrochemical assay to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to facilitate pandemic surveillance and monitoring of vaccine response.

Samantha H Chiang, Michael Tu, Jordan Cheng, Fang Wei, Feng Li, David Chia, Omai Garner, Sukantha Chandrasekaran, Richard Bender, Charles M Strom and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha H ChiangSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael TuLiquid Diagnostics, LLC, San Clemente, CA, USA.
Jordan ChengSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Fang WeiSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Feng LiSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David ChiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Omai GarnerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sukantha ChandrasekaranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard BenderLiquid Diagnostics, LLC, San Clemente, CA, USA.
Charles M StromLiquid Diagnostics, LLC, San Clemente, CA, USA.
David T W WongSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USAir Liquide (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

UC BRAID Center for Accelerated Innovation COVID-19 diagnostic project developmentU54HL119893 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PALAZZOLO, MICHAEL J · 2013 to 2020
$18.3M
Oral-piRNAs Enhance Re-epithelialization in Oral Wound HealingF30DE027615 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHIANG, SAMANTHA HSIN-YU · 2017 to 2020
$141k
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL119893NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE027615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amperial™ is a novel assay platform that uses immobilized antigen in a conductive polymer gel followed by an electrochemical detection. A highly specific and sensitive assay was developed to quantify levels of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in saliva. After establishing linearity and limit of detection we established a reference range of 5 standard deviations above the mean. There were no false positives in 667 consecutive saliva samples obtained prior to 2019. Saliva was obtained from 34 patients who had recovered from documented COVID-19 or had documented positive serologies. All of the patients with symptoms severe enough to seek medical attention had positive antibody tests and 88% overall had positive results. We obtained blinded paired saliva and plasma samples from 14 individuals. The plasma was analyzed using an EUA-FDA cleared ELISA kit and the saliva was analyzed by our Amperial™ assay. All 5 samples with negative plasma titers were negative in saliva testing. Eight of the 9 positive plasma samples were positive in saliva and 1 had borderline results. A CLIA validation was performed as a laboratory developed test in a high complexity laboratory. A quantitative non-invasive saliva based SARSCoV-2 antibody test was developed and validated with sufficient specificity to be useful for population-based monitoring and monitoring of individuals following vaccination.

Identifiers

PMID33236034
PMCPMC7685352
OpenAlexW3105996493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.