Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33236029›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020

Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 following non-hospitalised infection: clinical and ethnodemographic features associated with the magnitude of the antibody response.

Adrian M Shields, Sian E Faustini, Marisol Perez-Toledo, Sian Jossi, Joel D Allen, Saly Al-Taei, Claire Backhouse, Lynsey Dunbar, Daniel Ebanks, Beena Emmanuel and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrian M ShieldsClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sian E FaustiniClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Marisol Perez-ToledoInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sian JossiInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Joel D AllenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Saly Al-TaeiClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Claire BackhouseClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Lynsey DunbarClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Daniel EbanksClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Beena EmmanuelClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Aduragbemi A FaniyiBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark I GarveyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Annabel GrinbergsUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Golaleh McGinnellUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Joanne O'NeillUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Yasunori WatanabeInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Max CrispinInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
David C WraithUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Adam F CunninghamInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Mark T DraysonClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Alex G RichterClinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Immunology · HRUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Identification of neutralizing epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike for design of vaccines and small-molecule antiviralsUM1AI144462 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2019 to 2025
$201.6M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17183NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine clinical and ethnodemographic correlates of serological responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein following mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

designA retrospective cohort study of healthcare workers who had self-isolated due to COVID-19.

settingUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK (UHBFT).

participants956 health care workers were recruited by open invitation via UHBFT trust email and social media.

interventionParticipants volunteered a venous blood sample that was tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies. Results were interpreted in the context of the symptoms of their original illness and ethnodemographic variables.

resultsUsing an assay that simultaneously measures the combined IgG, IgA and IgM response against the spike glycoprotein (IgGAM), the overall seroprevalence within this cohort was 46.2% (n=442/956). The seroprevalence of immunoglobulin isotypes was 36.3%, 18.7% and 8.1% for IgG, IgA and IgM respectively. IgGAM identified serological responses in 40.6% (n=52/128) of symptomatic individuals who reported a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Increasing age, non-white ethnicity and obesity were independently associated with greater IgG antibody response against the spike glycoprotein. Self-reported fever and fatigue were associated with greater IgG and IgA responses against the spike glycoprotein. The combination of fever and/or cough and/or anosmia had a positive predictive value of 92.3% for seropositivity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Assays employing combined antibody detection demonstrate enhanced seroepidemiological sensitivity and can detect prior viral exposure even when PCR swabs have been negative. We demonstrate an association between known ethnodemographic risk factors associated with mortality from COVID-19 and the magnitude of serological responses in mild-to-moderate disease. The combination of cough, and/or fever and/or anosmia identifies the majority of individuals who should self-isolate for COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID33236029
PMCPMC7685342
OpenAlexW3101257628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.