ArticleIBRO reports2020
Cerebrospinal fluid oxygen optimisation for rescue of metabolically challenged in vitro cortical brain tissue.
Article in IBRO reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality internationally. Using an in vitro isolated cortex model, this study investigated the optimal cerebrospinal fluid oxygenation parameters for rescuing metabolically challenged cortical tissue. In particular, we asked whether maximizing oxygen content with oxygen nanobubbles could support improved tissue recovery. Mouse cortical slices were metabolically starved, followed by recovery in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing different levels of dissolved oxygen ranging from mean(SD) 2(0.5) to 39(1.0) mg/L; with and without oxygen nanobubbles. Tissue recovery was assessed by quantifying and comparing the amplitude, length, high frequency content and event frequency of seizure-like events generated in no-magnesium aCSF at the beginning and end of the protocol. In general, there was improved recovery with increasing oxygen content up to 25-34 mg/L. The outcome of slices recovered in nanobubbled aCSF was no different to conventionally oxygenated slices with similar dissolved oxygen content. Dissolved oxygen content above 34 mg/L afforded no additional benefit. In conclusion, aCSF dissolved oxygen content of approximately 30 mg/L is optimal for cortical tissue recovery from metabolic starvation, which is easily achievable using conventional oxygenation methods. Oxygen in the form of nanobubbles does not appear to be readily available for tissue oxidative processes in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.