ArticleResearch and reports in urology2020
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP) and Transurethral Enucleation with a Bipolar System (TUEB): A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Research and reports in urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dark side of transurethral access for LUTS/BPH surgery: a narrative review.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
- Surgical reintervention requirements following GreenLight PVP: A single-center experience using three different laser device models.Arab journal of urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and transurethral enucleation with a bipolar system (TUEB). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients who underwent PVP or TUEB surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms due to bladder outlet obstruction at our institution from September 2015 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 83 patients (PVP: n=45, TUEB: n=38) who were available for follow-up at least 12 months after surgery were included. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes-such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and complications-at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were compared between the two groups.
resultsAlthough differences in age, IPSS, and QoL were not significant, a significantly greater prostate volume, lower Qmax, and greater PVR were noted in the TUEB group. In perioperative parameters, a significantly shorter operation time, less change in serum hemoglobin, fewer days of catheterization, and shorter length of stay were observed in the PVP group. As for postoperative outcomes, the IPSS storage subscore and PVR were significantly improved in the TUEB group. As complications, stress urinary incontinence was more frequently observed in the TUEB group, and urethral stricture was more common in the PVP group.
conclusionThe present data suggest that PVP and TUEB are efficient and safe surgical treatment options. Management of patients undergoing PVP in the perioperative period appears easy. Improvements of subjective and objective parameters were superior after TUEB than after PVP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.