Trial reportOncoimmunology2020
Anti-cancer immunotherapy using cancer-derived multiple epitope-peptides cocktail vaccination clinical studies in patients with refractory/persistent disease of uterine cervical cancer and ovarian cancer [phase 2].
Trial report in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive bibliometric analysis (2000-2022) on the mapping of knowledge regarding immunotherapeutic treatments for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- HJURP upregulation, driven by transcription factor NFYA, promotes endometrial carcinoma progression via regulating RASSF8 ubiquitination.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Development and assessment of a peptide vaccine against ovarian cancer utilizing nanoliposomes loaded with P53, WT1, and CA125 epitopes.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Targeting MELK in tumor cells and tumor microenvironment: from function and mechanism to therapeutic application.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- FOXM1/DEPDC1 feedback loop promotes hepatocarcinogenesis and represents promising targets for cancer therapy.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Immunotherapy in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Tumor vaccines: Toward multidimensional anti-tumor therapies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- The Role of Polo-Like Kinase 1 in Regulating the Forkhead Box Family Transcription Factors.Cells · 2023Review
- Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer-A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Cancers · 2022Review
- A narrative review of the emerging role of lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus K in cancer: from basic research to clinical practice.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We had conducted phase 1/2 studies of cancer vaccination therapy using neo-tumor antigens in patients with refractory/persistent cervical cancer (CC) and ovarian cancer (OC) to assess the feasibility and efficacy. Enrollees must be refractory/persistent disease for usual treatments with Human Leukocyte Antigen-A*0201 or A*2402. The targets were epitope peptides obtained from driver genes in surviving pathways as follows: for CC A*0201, peptides from Up Regulating Lung Cancer 10 gene (URLC10) and Hypoxia-inducible gene 2 (HIG-2) and for OC A*0201, HIG2, VEGFR (vascular epithelial growth factor receptor) 1 and 2 were used. For CC A*2402, Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1), Maternal Embryonic Leucine zipper Kinase (MELK), and Holliday Junction Recognition Protein (HJURP) were used. For OC A*2402, cocktails of peptides from FOXM1, MELK, HJURP, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 were used. Subcutaneous administration was performed with adjuvant weekly. The toxicity profiles and tumor-response were analyzed in eight-week interval. Sixty-six patients were accrued, and 64 were evaluable for adverse events (AEs), and 35 for response. AEs of G2/3 dermatologic reaction (DR) of injection site had been identified in 15.6% and no other severe AEs were detected. Response rate in OC and CC were 22.9% and 20%, respectively. Median overall survival showed longer in performance status (PS) 0 (versus PS1/2), in CRP negative (versus positive) and in DR positive (versus negative) such as 8.7 m versus 1.2 m (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.