ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Clinical efficacy of intravenous anesthesia on breast segmental surgery and its effects on oxidative stress response and hemodynamics of patients.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Intravenous Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair of Children.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of intravenous anesthesia on breast segmental surgery and the effects on hemodynamics of patients. A total of 267 patients were collected as research subjects. These patients underwent breast segmental surgery in Chun'an First People's Hospital from March 2015 to September 2018. Among them, 137 patients undergoing intravenous anesthesia were the research group, and 130 patients undergoing inhalation anesthesia were the control group. The following parameters were recorded: Clinical efficacy, postoperative adverse conditions, hemodynamic indicators including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to observe the analgesic effect of the two groups, the mental state of patients in the two groups was observed by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scoring method, and systemic evaluation was made by oxidative stress (OS) reaction indicators. The MMSE scores of the two groups decreased one day after surgery, but the score in the research group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of SBP and DBP at T1 and T2 in the control group were significantly higher than those in the research group (P<0.05). HR of research group at T1 and T2 was lower than that at T0 and that at corresponding time of control group (P<0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative adverse reactions in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, intravenous anesthesia for breast segmental surgery can reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions after surgery, with complete sedation and analgesia. Patients were able to wake up quickly and stably after surgery, and their cognitive function and OS recovered rapidly. However, due to the great impact on hemodynamics during surgery, attention should be paid to maintain hemodynamic stability during surgery to avoid hypotension and bradycardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.