Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33235599›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Validity of STONE Score in Clinical Prediction of Ureteral Stone Disease.

Abdul Malik, Syed Mohkumuddin, Shazia Yousaf, Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig, Ayesha Afzal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdul MalikDr. Abdul Malik FCPS Medicine, FCPS (Fellow Nephrology), Senior Registrar Internal Medicine, Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Syed MohkumuddinDr. Syed Mohkumuddin (FCPS Nephrology), Assistant Professor Nephrology, Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Shazia YousafDr. Shazia Yousaf (FCPS Medicine), Senior Registrar, Medical Unit, Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Mirza Ahmad Raza BaigMr. Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig. Clinical Perfusion Specialist, Hail Cardiac Center, Saudi Arabia.
Ayesha AfzalMiss. Ayesha Afzal, University of Health Sciences Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Alhamd Islamic University · PKBolan Medical College · PKUniversity of Ha'il · SAUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore · PKZiauddin Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the external validity of STONE score for predicting the probability of ureteral stone in patients presenting in emergency department with suspicion of ureteral stones.

methodsIn this prospective validation study, a total of 134 patients aged above 18 years, and first time arrived in the emergency unit for treatment of flank pain and then referred for the CT scan for suspected ureteral stone in Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, from 10-June-2018 to 15-Oct-2019 were included. STONE score calculation was done before sending the patient to the CT scan, using the same protocol as defined by Moore et al. Based on STONE score patients classified into the low-risk group (0 to 5), moderate-risk group (5 to 9) and the high-risk group (10 to13). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and test characteristics were calculated for STONE score.

resultsThe mean age was 39.2± 11.2 years, there were 86 (64.17%) men and 48 (35.83%) women. there were 26.8% patients having low-risk score, 52.23% moderate-risk and 21.97% high-risk score. On receiver operating curve (ROC) the area under curve (AUC) of the stone score was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.83), the lower band of AUC 0.67 and upper band 0.83. In high risk STONE score the sensitivity of STONE score was 66.7% and specificity was 75.0%.

conclusionBased on our study results, CT scan and ultrasonography are standard diagnostic tools for suspected ureterolithiasis but in emergency unit, use of STONE score to categorize the patient as low risk, moderate-risk and high-risk of ureteral stone can help the physician (clinician) to take decision either there is a need of further investigation or not.

Indexed as

STONE scoreUreteral stones

Identifiers

PMID33235599
PMCPMC7674914
OpenAlexW3094510920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.