Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33235552›Full record

ArticleMicrofluidics and nanofluidics2020

Multiscale modeling of hemolysis during microfiltration.

Mehdi Nikfar, Meghdad Razizadeh, Ratul Paul, Yaling Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CaBMC biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehdi Nikfar *Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Meghdad Razizadeh *Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Ratul PaulDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Yaling LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4519-3358
Lehigh University · US

Funding

Supplement: Hemolysis Prediction Software DevelopmentR01HL131750 · NHLBI · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, YALING · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a multiscale numerical algorithm to simulate the hemolytic release of hemoglobin (Hb) from red blood cells (RBCs) flowing through sieves containing micropores with mean diameters smaller than RBCs. Analyzing the RBC damage in microfiltration is important in the sense that it can quantify the sensitivity of human erythrocytes to mechanical hemolysis while they undergo high shear rate and high deformation. Here, the numerical simulations are carried out via lattice Boltzmann method and spring connected network (SN) coupled by an immersed boundary method. To predict the RBC sublytic damage, a sub-cellular damage model derived from molecular dynamic simulations is incorporated in the cellular solver. In the proposed algorithm, the local RBC strain distribution calculated by the cellular solver is used to obtain the pore radius on the RBC membrane. Index of hemolysis (IH) is calculated by resorting to the resulting pore radius and solving a diffusion equation considering the effects of steric hinderance and increased hydrodynamic drag due to the size of the hemoglobin molecule. It should be mentioned that current computational hemolysis models usually utilize empirical fitting of the released free hemoglobin (Hb) in plasma from damaged RBCs. These empirical correlations contain ad hoc parameters that depend on specific device and operating conditions, thus cannot be used to predict hemolysis under different conditions. In contrast to the available hemolysis model, the proposed algorithm does not have any empirical parameters. Therefore, it can predict the IH in microfilter with different sieve pore sizes and filtration pressures. Also, in contrast to empirical correlations in which the Hb release is related to shear stress and exposure time without considering the physical processes, the proposed model links flow-induced deformation of the RBC membrane to membrane permeabilization and hemoglobin release. In this paper, the cellular solver is validated by simulating optical tweezers experiment, shear flow experiment as well as an experiment to measure RBC deformability in a very narrow microchannel. Moreover, the shape of a single RBC at the rupture moment is compared with corresponding experimental data. Finally, to validate the damage model, the results obtained from our parametric study on the role of filtration pressure and sieve pore size in Hb release are compared with experimental data. Numerical results are in good agreement with experimental data. Similar to the corresponding experiment, the numerical results confirm that hemolysis increases with increasing the filtration pressure and reduction in pore size on the sieve. While in experiment, the RBC pore size cannot be measured, the numerical results can quantify the RBC pore size. The numerical results show that at the sieve pore size of 2.2 μm above 25 cm Hg, RBC pore size is above 75 nm and RBCs experience rupture. More importantly, the results demonstrate that the proposed approach is independent from the operating conditions and it can estimate the hemolysis in a wide range of filtration pressure and sieve pore size with reasonable accuracy.

Indexed as

HemolysisHigh deformationHigh shear rateMicrofiltrationMultiscale modelingRed blood cell

Identifiers

PMID33235552
PMCPMC7682248
OpenAlexW3015331262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.