ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020
Predictors of Referral to Pulmonary Rehabilitation from UK Primary Care.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Guideline
- Exploring the prevalence and impact of hip and knee pain in pulmonary rehabilitation: a propensity-matched cohort study.Respiratory research · 2022Trial
- Fidelity of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in people with COPD referred from primary care.Chronic respiratory diseaseTrial
- Toward Holistic COPD Management: The Case for Mental Health Integration.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The inverse palliative care law in advanced lung disease: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Article
- A service evaluation following the implementation of computer guided consultation software to support primary care reviews for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Comorbidities reduce survival and quality of life in COPD with severe lung hyperinflation.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Referral to pulmonary rehabilitation and palliative care services in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in England, 2010-2019.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Barriers to Pulmonary Rehabilitation.Respiratory care · 2024Article
- Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023Article
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.The European respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Management of COPD in the Real World: Can Studies Reveal Errors in Management and Pathways to Improve Patient Care?Pragmatic and observational research · 2023Review
- Exploring the Presence of Implicit Bias Amongst Healthcare Professionals Who Refer Individuals Living with COPD to Pulmonary Rehabilitation with a Specific Focus Upon Smoking and Exercise.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- SINFONIA study protocol: a phase II/III randomised controlled trial examining benefits of guided online group singing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease and their carers.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- The Need for Expanding Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- [Characteristics of pulmonary rehabilitation: results of a national audit].Open respiratory archivesArticle
- The long-term clinical impact of COPD exacerbations: a 3-year observational study (SHERLOCK).Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A large proportion of people with COPD are not referred to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) despite its proven benefits. No previous studies have examined predictors of referral to PR. Objective: To determine the characteristics of people with COPD associated with referral to PR. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of a primary care cohort of 82,696 Welsh people with COPD generated as part of a UK national audit of COPD care. Data represent care received by patients as of 31/03/2017. Referral to PR was defined as any code in the patient record indicating referral to PR in the last 3 years. Potential predictors of referral to PR were chosen based on clinical judgement and data availability. Independent predictors of PR referral were determined using backward stepwise mixed-effects logistic regression with a random effect for practice. Variables assessed were: age, gender, deprivation, MRC recorded in past year, MRC grade, smoking status recorded in past year, smoking status, number of exacerbations in past year, inhaled therapy prescription, influenza vaccination, and comorbidities of diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, lung cancer, asthma, bronchiectasis, depression, anxiety, severe mental illness, osteoporosis, and painful condition. Results: A total of 13,297 people (16%) with COPD were referred from primary care for PR. Patients with a comorbidity of bronchiectasis or depression, MRC recorded in the last year, higher MRC grade, more exacerbations in the last year, a greater level of inhaled therapy, an influenza vaccination, or were an ex-smoker had significantly higher odds of referral to PR. Patients that were older, female, more deprived, or had a comorbidity of diabetes, asthma, or painful condition had significantly lower odds of referral to PR. Conclusion: Generally appropriate patients are being prioritised for PR referral; however, it is concerning that women, current smokers, and more deprived patients appear to have lower odds of referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.