Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33235443›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Predictors of Referral to Pulmonary Rehabilitation from UK Primary Care.

Philip W Stone, Katherine Hickman, Michael C Steiner, C Michael Roberts, Jennifer K Quint, Sally J Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip W StoneNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2326-4987
Katherine HickmanWest Yorkshire and Harrogate Health and Care Partnership, Bradford, Yorkshire, UK.
Michael C SteinerNIHR Leicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-0614
C Michael RobertsRoyal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Jennifer K Quint *National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-4869
Sally J Singh *NIHR Leicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9834-0366
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A large proportion of people with COPD are not referred to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) despite its proven benefits. No previous studies have examined predictors of referral to PR. Objective: To determine the characteristics of people with COPD associated with referral to PR. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of a primary care cohort of 82,696 Welsh people with COPD generated as part of a UK national audit of COPD care. Data represent care received by patients as of 31/03/2017. Referral to PR was defined as any code in the patient record indicating referral to PR in the last 3 years. Potential predictors of referral to PR were chosen based on clinical judgement and data availability. Independent predictors of PR referral were determined using backward stepwise mixed-effects logistic regression with a random effect for practice. Variables assessed were: age, gender, deprivation, MRC recorded in past year, MRC grade, smoking status recorded in past year, smoking status, number of exacerbations in past year, inhaled therapy prescription, influenza vaccination, and comorbidities of diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, lung cancer, asthma, bronchiectasis, depression, anxiety, severe mental illness, osteoporosis, and painful condition. Results: A total of 13,297 people (16%) with COPD were referred from primary care for PR. Patients with a comorbidity of bronchiectasis or depression, MRC recorded in the last year, higher MRC grade, more exacerbations in the last year, a greater level of inhaled therapy, an influenza vaccination, or were an ex-smoker had significantly higher odds of referral to PR. Patients that were older, female, more deprived, or had a comorbidity of diabetes, asthma, or painful condition had significantly lower odds of referral to PR. Conclusion: Generally appropriate patients are being prioritised for PR referral; however, it is concerning that women, current smokers, and more deprived patients appear to have lower odds of referral.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationUnited Kingdomchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPDgeneral practitionerGPobservational study

Identifiers

PMID33235443
PMCPMC7678715
OpenAlexW3105964792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.