ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2020
Sex Differences in the Mortality Risk of Elderly Patients with Systolic Heart Failure in Taiwan.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- STEP Towards Better Blood Pressure Control: The Prime Time for a Universal Target of < 130/80 mmHg.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex differences in heart failure mortality might be affected by age, race, and treatment response. Many large studies in Western countries have shown conflicting results, however few studies have been conducted in Asian patients.
objectivesWe prospectively investigated the mortality risk in a multicenter cohort of 1,093 male and 416 female heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) hospitalized for worsening symptoms in Taiwan between 2013 and 2015.
methodsKaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional regression analyses were used to determine the one-year mortality risk by sex.
resultsThere were no significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular events, re-admission rate, and mortality between sexes in the overall cohort and the young subgroup during one-year of follow-up. In the elderly subgroup, the overall and cardiac mortality rate of the male patients were higher than those of the female patients (p = 0.035, p = 0.049, respectively). We found that the prognostic effect of old age on overall mortality rate appeared to be stronger in the male patients (p < 0.0001) than in the female patients (p = 0.69) in Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Male sex was a risk factor for all-cause mortality in the elderly (hazard ratio: 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.25) independently of systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin concentration, kidney function, and medications.
conclusionsIn the Taiwan HFrEF registry, the highest mortality risk was observed in male patients aged 65 years or more. Clinicians need to pay more attention to these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.