ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2020
Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part II. The Consensus for Pulmonary Embolism and Updates.
Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massive Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism in a Healthy 37-Year-Old Male: A Case of Atypical Presentation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Risk factors for pulmonary embolism in lung cancer patients with lower limb deep venous thrombosis: a case-control study.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Endovascular Biopsy for Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma Mimicking Pulmonary Embolism.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Review
- Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Taiwanese Perspective on Therapeutic Options with Focus on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Review
- The Diagnostic Value of Bedside Echocardiography and Lower Extremity Blood Vessels in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Stem cells international · 2022Article
- Endovascular Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Diseases.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Review
- Correspondence to: Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part II. The Consensus for Pulmonary Embolism and Updates.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
- Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part II. The Consensus for Pulmonary Embolism and Updates.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
- To Test or Not to Test: Thrombophilia in Venous Thromboembolisms.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potential life-threatening condition and risk-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic management conveys a favorable outcome. For patients at high risk for early complications and mortality, prompt exclusion or confirmation of PE by imaging is the key step to initiate and facilitate reperfusion treatment. Among patients with hemodynamic instability, systemic thrombolysis improves survival, whereas surgical embolectomy or percutaneous intervention are alternatives in experienced hands in scenarios where systemic thrombolysis is not the best preferred thromboreduction measure. For patients with suspected PE who are not at high risk for early complications and mortality, the organized approach using a structured evaluation system to assess the pretest probability, the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs, the appropriate selection of imaging tools, and proper interpretation of imaging results is important when deciding the allocation of treatment strategies. Patients with PE requires anticoagulation treatment. In patients with cancer and thrombosis, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) used to be the standard regimen. Recently, three factor Xa inhibitors collectively show that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective as LMWH in four randomized clinical trials. Therefore, NOACs are suitable and preferred in most conditions. Finally, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is the most disabling long-term complication of PE. Because of its low incidence, the extra caution should be given when managing patients with PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.