Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33235412›Full record

ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2020

Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part II. The Consensus for Pulmonary Embolism and Updates.

Kang-Ling Wang, Yung-Ta Kao, Wei-Tien Chang, Hsien-Yuan Chang, Wei-Chun Huang, Po-Chao Hsu, Chih-Hsin Hsu, Chien-Lung Huang, Li-Chuan Hsieh, Chi-Yen Wang and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kang-Ling WangGeneral Clinical Research Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital & School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University.
Yung-Ta KaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University.
Wei-Tien ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital & College of Medicine, National Taiwan University.
Hsien-Yuan ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital & College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University.
Wei-Chun HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung & School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University.
Po-Chao HsuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Chih-Hsin HsuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital & College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University.
Chien-Lung HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng Hsin General Hospital.
Li-Chuan HsiehDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, China Medical Hospital, China Medical University.
Chi-Yen WangCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital.
Yen-Hung LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital & College of Medicine, National Taiwan University.
Tsung-Hsien LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Kuan-Ming ChiuDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital.
Juey-Jen HwangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital & College of Medicine, National Taiwan University.
Pao-Hsien ChuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University & College of Medicine, Chang Gung University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potential life-threatening condition and risk-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic management conveys a favorable outcome. For patients at high risk for early complications and mortality, prompt exclusion or confirmation of PE by imaging is the key step to initiate and facilitate reperfusion treatment. Among patients with hemodynamic instability, systemic thrombolysis improves survival, whereas surgical embolectomy or percutaneous intervention are alternatives in experienced hands in scenarios where systemic thrombolysis is not the best preferred thromboreduction measure. For patients with suspected PE who are not at high risk for early complications and mortality, the organized approach using a structured evaluation system to assess the pretest probability, the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs, the appropriate selection of imaging tools, and proper interpretation of imaging results is important when deciding the allocation of treatment strategies. Patients with PE requires anticoagulation treatment. In patients with cancer and thrombosis, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) used to be the standard regimen. Recently, three factor Xa inhibitors collectively show that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective as LMWH in four randomized clinical trials. Therefore, NOACs are suitable and preferred in most conditions. Finally, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is the most disabling long-term complication of PE. Because of its low incidence, the extra caution should be given when managing patients with PE.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsDiagnosisPulmonary embolismTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33235412
PMCPMC7677645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.