Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33235202›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Shape-preserving erosion controlled by the graded microarchitecture of shark tooth enameloid.

Shahrouz Amini, Hajar Razi, Ronald Seidel, Daniel Werner, William T White, James C Weaver, Mason N Dean, Peter Fratzl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The geometry of Nature's stingers is universal due to stochastic mechanical wear.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tooth Diversity Underpins Future Biomimetic Replications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Forced Biomineralization: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Shahrouz AminiMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1928-2760
Hajar RaziMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-0801
Ronald SeidelMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-6726
Daniel WernerMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-8194
William T WhiteCSIRO Australian National Fish Collection, National Research Collections Australia, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9705-2453
James C WeaverSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6522-7359
Mason N DeanMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. Mason.Dean@mpikg.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5026-6216
Peter FratzlMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. Peter.Fratzl@mpikg.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4437-7830
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DECommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The teeth of all vertebrates predominantly comprise the same materials, but their lifespans vary widely: in stark contrast to mammals, shark teeth are functional only for weeks, rather than decades, making lifelong durability largely irrelevant. However, their diets are diverse and often mechanically demanding, and as such, their teeth should maintain a functional morphology, even in the face of extremely high and potentially damaging contact stresses. Here, we reconcile the dilemma between the need for an operative tooth geometry and the unavoidable damage inherent to feeding on hard foods, demonstrating that the tooth cusps of Port Jackson sharks, hard-shelled prey specialists, possess unusual microarchitecture that controls tooth erosion in a way that maintains functional cusp shape. The graded architecture in the enameloid provokes a location-specific damage response, combining chipping of outer enameloid and smooth wear of inner enameloid to preserve an efficient shape for grasping hard prey. Our discovery provides experimental support for the dominant theory that multi-layered tooth enameloid facilitated evolutionary diversification of shark ecologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBiomechanical PhenomenaBiomineralizationDental EnamelDentinHardnessMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSharksSpectrum Analysis, RamanTooth

Identifiers

PMID33235202
PMCPMC7686312
OpenAlexW3108923835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.