Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234846›Full record

ArticleMelanoma research2021

Safety and efficacy of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from a North American expanded access program (CheckMate 218).

F Stephen Hodi, Paul B Chapman, Mario Sznol, Christopher D Lao, Rene Gonzalez, Michael Smylie, Gregory A Daniels, John A Thompson, Ragini Kudchadkar, William Sharfman and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Melanoma research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

F Stephen HodiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paul B ChapmanMedical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mario SznolMedical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Christopher D LaoDermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rene GonzalezMedical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Michael SmylieMedical Oncology and Clinical Research, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gregory A DanielsMedical Oncology, UC San Diego Health - La Jolla, La Jolla, California.
John A ThompsonPhase 1 Clinical Trials Program, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Ragini KudchadkarDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
William SharfmanCutaneous Oncology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael AtkinsMedical Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC.
David R SpigelMedical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee.
Anna PavlickMedical Oncology, Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Jose MonzonMedical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kevin B KimMedical Oncology, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Scott ErnstMedical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Nikhil I KhushalaniCutaneous Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Wim van DijckBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Maurice LoboBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
David HoggDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USBloomberg (United States) · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterLondon Health Sciences Centre · CAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASarah Cannon · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CheckMate 218, a North American expanded access program (EAP), investigated nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Safety and efficacy, including 2-year survival in clinically relevant patient subgroups, are reported. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and no prior checkpoint inhibitors. Patients received nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (induction) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (maintenance) until progression or unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of 48 weeks. Safety and overall survival (OS) data were collected. This EAP included 754 treated patients from the USA (n = 580) and Canada (n = 174). Median follow-up time was 17.8 months. All-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 96% and 53% of patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 36% and 26% of patients, respectively. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 82% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79-84] and 70% (95% CI 66-74), respectively. Twenty-four-month OS rates were 63% in patients aged ≥75 years, 56% in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, 73% in patients with BRAF wild-type tumors, 70% in patients with BRAF mutant tumors, and 56% in patients with mucosal melanoma. In this EAP, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated high survival rates and safety outcomes consistent with those from randomized clinical trials, further supporting the use of this combination for advanced melanoma across multiple subgroups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabNorth AmericaUnited StatesYoung AdultIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID33234846
PMCPMC7757740
OpenAlexW3107960404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.