Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234544›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Correspondence between Monkey Visual Cortices and Layers of a Saliency Map Model Based on a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Representations of Natural Images.

Nobuhiko Wagatsuma, Akinori Hidaka, Hiroshi Tamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nobuhiko WagatsumaFaculty of Science, Toho University, Miyama 2-2-1, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8510 nwagatsuma@is.sci.toho-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-9223
Akinori HidakaSchool of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Ishizaka, Hatoyama-machi, Hiki-gun, Saitama 350-0394.
Hiroshi TamuraGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional selection is a function that allocates the brain's computational resources to the most important part of a visual scene at a specific moment. Saliency map models have been proposed as computational models to predict attentional selection within a spatial location. Recent saliency map models based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) exhibit the highest performance for predicting the location of attentional selection and human gaze, which reflect overt attention. Trained DCNNs potentially provide insight into the perceptual mechanisms of biological visual systems. However, the relationship between artificial and neural representations used for determining attentional selection and gaze location remains unknown. To understand the mechanism underlying saliency map models based on DCNNs and the neural system of attentional selection, we investigated the correspondence between layers of a DCNN saliency map model and monkey visual areas for natural image representations. We compared the characteristics of the responses in each layer of the model with those of the neural representation in the primary visual (V1), intermediate visual (V4), and inferior temporal (IT) cortices. Regardless of the DCNN layer level, the characteristics of the responses were consistent with that of the neural representation in V1. We found marked peaks of correspondence between V1 and the early level and higher-intermediate-level layers of the model. These results provide insight into the mechanism of the trained DCNN saliency map model and suggest that the neural representations in V1 play an important role in computing the saliency that mediates attentional selection, which supports the V1 saliency hypothesis.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalVisual CortexAnimalsAttentionHaplorhiniNeural Networks, Computerattentioncomputational modeldeep learningsaliency mapV1 saliency hypothesisvisual system

Identifiers

PMID33234544
PMCPMC7890521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.