ArticleBJGP open2021
Multiple long-term conditions within households and use of health and social care: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BJGP open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Associations between housing tenure and unscheduled hospital use in people of working age with multiple physical and mental long-term conditions: a retrospective cohort study using linked data from London.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A multidimensional framework for mapping social need to electronic health records in people with multimorbidity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Variations in social care need reporting amongst GP practices in England: a retrospective cohort study in people with multimorbidity.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Estimating households and populations from primary care electronic health records: comparison with Office for National Statistics Census 2021 aggregated estimates.International journal of population data science · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling for identification of older adults with high utilization of health and social services.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- Determining households from patient addresses and unique property reference numbers in general practitioner electronic health records.International journal of population data science · 2024Article
- Clustering by multiple long-term conditions and social care needs: a cross-sectional study among 10 026 older adults in England.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2023Article
- General practice nurse trainees' perspectives on general practice nursing as a career choice: qualitative findings from a vocational training scheme in the United Kingdom (UK).BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Article
- Understanding social care need through primary care big data: a rapid scoping review.BJGP open · 2022Article
- Article
- One year follow-up and exploratory analysis of a patient-centered interdisciplinary care intervention for multimorbidity.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
- Eliciting and prioritising determinants of improved care in multimorbidity: A modified online Delphi study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe daily management of long-term conditions falls primarily on individuals and informal carers, but the impact of household context on health and social care activity among people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is understudied.
aimTo test whether co-residence with a person with MLTCs (compared with a co-resident without MLTCs) is associated with utilisation and cost of primary, community, secondary health care, and formal social care. DESIGN &
settingLinked data from health providers and local government in Barking and Dagenham for a retrospective cohort of people aged ≥50 years in two-person households in 2016-2018.
methodTwo-part regression models were applied to estimate annualised use and cost of hospital, primary, community, mental health, and social care by MLTC status of individuals and co-residents, adjusted for age, sex, and deprivation. Applicability at the national level was tested using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
resultsForty-eight per cent of people with MLTCs in two-person households were co-resident with another person with MLTCs. They were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 1.30) times as likely to have community care activity and 1.24 (95% CI = 0.99 to 1.54) times as likely to have mental health care activity compared with those co-resident with a healthy person. They had more primary care visits (8.5 [95% CI = 8.2 to 8.8] versus 7.9 [95% CI = 7.7 to 8.2]) and higher primary care costs. Outpatient care and elective admissions did not differ. Findings in national data were similar.
conclusionCare utilisation for people with MLTCs varies by household context. There may be potential for connecting health and community service input across household members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.