Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234502›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

Labour companionship and women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth: results from a multi-country community-based survey.

Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Khalidha Nasiri, Hedieh Mehrtash, Anne-Marie Soumah, Meghan A Bohren, Boubacar Alpha Diallo, Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan, Thae Maung Maung, Soe Soe Thwin, Adeniyi K Aderoba and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mamadou Dioulde Balde *Cellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea baldemddka@gmail.com.
Khalidha Nasiri *Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-1085
Hedieh MehrtashDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-616X
Anne-Marie SoumahCellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea.
Meghan A BohrenCentre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-4682
Boubacar Alpha DialloCellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea.
Theresa Azonima IrinyenikanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Schools, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria.
Thae Maung MaungDepartment of Medical Research, Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-3813
Soe Soe ThwinDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Adeniyi K AderobaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Schools, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Akure, Ondo, Nigeria.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Programme, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-7096
Nwe Oo MonDepartment of Medical Research, Yangon, Myanmar.
Kwame Adu-BonsaffohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-682X

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence has shown the benefits of labour companions during childbirth. Few studies have documented the relationship between the absence of labour companions and mistreatment of women during childbirth in low-income and middle-income countries using a standardised tool.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the WHO multi-country study on how women are treated during childbirth, where a cross-sectional community survey was conducted with women up to 8 weeks after childbirth in Ghana, Guinea, Nigeria and Myanmar. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine whether labour companionship was associated with various types of mistreatment.

resultsOf 2672 women, about half (50.4%) reported the presence of a labour companion. Approximately half (49.6%) of these women reported that the timing of support was during labour and after childbirth and most of the labour companions (47.0%) were their family members. Across Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria, women without a labour companion were more likely to report physical abuse, non-consented medical procedures and poor communication compared with women with a labour companion. However, there were country-level variations. In Guinea, the absence of labour companionship was associated with any physical abuse, verbal abuse, or stigma or discrimination (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.6, 1.9-6.9) and non-consented vaginal examinations (AOR 3.2, 1.6-6.4). In Ghana, it was associated with non-consented vaginal examinations (AOR 2.3, 1.7-3.1) and poor communication (AOR 2.0, 1.3-3.2). In Nigeria, it was associated with longer wait times (AOR 0.6, 0.3-0.9).

conclusionLabour companionship is associated with lower levels of some forms of mistreatment that women experience during childbirth, depending on the setting. Further work is needed to ascertain how best to implement context-specific labour companionship to ensure benefits while maintaining women's choices and autonomy.

Indexed as

DoulasLabor, ObstetricCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGhanaGuineaHumansMyanmarNigeriaPandemicsParturitionPregnancySARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairescommunity-based surveyhealth policyhealth systemsmaternal healthobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID33234502
PMCPMC7684665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.