Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234172›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2020

Barriers and facilitators for treatment-seeking for mental health conditions and substance misuse: multi-perspective focus group study within the military.

Rebecca Bogaers, Elbert Geuze, Jaap van Weeghel, Fenna Leijten, Dike van de Mheen, Piia Varis, Andrea Rozema, Evelien Brouwers

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. BJPsych open · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca BogaersTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellfare, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University; and Brain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-9861
Elbert GeuzeBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence; and Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jaap van WeeghelTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellfare, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
Fenna LeijtenStrategic Military Healthcare Department, Ministry of Defence, the Netherlands.
Dike van de MheenTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellfare, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
Piia VarisDepartment of Culture Studies, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
Andrea RozemaTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellfare, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
Evelien BrouwersStrategic Military Healthcare Department, Ministry of Defence, the Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLMinistry of Defence · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, millions are exposed to stressors at work that increase their vulnerability to develop mental health conditions and substance misuse (such as soldiers, policemen, doctors). However, these types of professionals especially are expected to be strong and healthy, and this contrast may worsen their treatment gap. Although the treatment gap in the military has been studied before, perspectives of different stakeholders involved have largely been ignored, even though they play an important role.

aimsTo study the barriers and facilitators for treatment-seeking in the military, from three different perspectives.

methodIn total, 46 people participated, divided into eight homogeneous focus groups, including three perspectives: soldiers with mental health conditions and substance misuse (n = 20), soldiers without mental health conditions and substance misuse (n = 10) and mental health professionals (n = 16). Sessions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was done by applying a general inductive approach using ATLAS.ti-8.4.4 software.

resultsFive barriers for treatment-seeking were identified: fear of negative career consequences, fear of social rejection, confidentiality concerns, the 'strong worker' workplace culture and practical barriers. Three facilitators were identified: social support, accessibility and knowledge, and healthcare within the military. The views of the different stakeholder groups were highly congruent.

conclusionsBarriers for treatment-seeking were mostly stigma related (fear of career consequences, fear of social rejection and the 'strong worker' workplace culture) and this was widely recognised by all groups. Social support from family, peers, supervisors and professionals were identified as important facilitators. A decrease in the treatment gap for mental health conditions and substance misuse is needed and these findings provide direction for future research and destigmatising interventions.

Indexed as

Mental health conditionsmilitarystigmasubstance misusetreatment gap

Identifiers

PMID33234172
PMCPMC7745246
OpenAlexW3096860334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.