Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234110›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Seroprevalence, spatial dispersion and factors associated with flavivirus and chikungunha infection in a risk area: a population-based seroprevalence study in Brazil.

Francisca Kalline de Almeida Barreto, Carlos Henrique Alencar, Fernanda Montenegro de Carvalho Araújo, Rhaquel de Morais Alves Barbosa Oliveira, John Washington Cavalcante, Daniele Rocha Queiroz Lemos, Luís Arthur Brasil Gadelha Farias, Isac Lucca Frota Boriz, Leticia Queiroz Medeiros, Marcelo Nunes Pereira Melo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chikungunya seroprevalence in population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francisca Kalline de Almeida BarretoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. kallineabarreto@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9767-7154
Carlos Henrique AlencarPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-532X
Fernanda Montenegro de Carvalho AraújoFaculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Christus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-9109
Rhaquel de Morais Alves Barbosa OliveiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-5878
John Washington CavalcantePrograma de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-5451
Daniele Rocha Queiroz LemosFaculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Christus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-3785
Luís Arthur Brasil Gadelha FariasFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-9903
Isac Lucca Frota BorizPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1716-180X
Leticia Queiroz MedeirosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-6792
Marcelo Nunes Pereira MeloFaculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Christus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0186-8499
Fábio MiyajimaFundação Oswaldo Cruz Ceará, Eusébio, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-4825
André Machado SiqueiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Presidência da Fiocruz, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas (INI/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-0294
André Ricardo Ribas FreitasFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-7771
Luciano Pamplona de Góes CavalcantiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3440-1182
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUnichristus · BRFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BR

Funding

CNPQ MCTIC/CNPq 28/2018FUNCAP 01/2017-SUS/PPSUS-CE FUNCAPSESA-Decit/SCTIE/MS-CNPq
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe State of Ceará, in Northeastern Brazil, suffers from a triple burden of arboviruses (dengue, Zika and chikungunya). We measured the seroprevalence of chikungunya, dengue and Zika and its associated factors in the population of Juazeiro do Norte, Southern Ceará State, Brazil.

methodsA cross-sectional study of analytical and spatial analysis was performed to estimate the seroprevalence of dengue, Zika and chikungunya, in the year 2018. Participants were tested for IgM and IgG against these three viruses. Those with IgM and/or IgG positive tests results were considered positive. Poisson regression was used to analyze the factors associated with positive cases, in the same way that the spatial analysis of positive cases was performed to verify whether the cases were grouped.

resultsOf the 404 participants, 25.0% (103/404) were positive for CHIKV, 92.0% (373/404) for flavivirus (dengue or Zika) and of these, 37.9% (153/404) samples were classified as probable dengue infection. Of those who reported having had an arbovirus in the past, positive CHIKV cases had 58.7% arthralgia (PR = 4.31; 95% CI: 2.06-9.03; p = 0.000) mainly in the hands, ankles and feet. Age over 60 years had a positive association with cases of flavivirus (PR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.54; p = 0.000). Fever, muscle pain, joint pain and skin rash were the most reported symptoms (46.1, 41.0, 38.3 and 28.41%, respectively). The positive cases of chikungunya and dengue or Zika were grouped in space and the city center was most affected area.

conclusionsFour years after the introduction of CHIKV, where DENV has been in circulation for over 30 years, 1/4 of the population has already been exposed, showing the extent of the epidemic. The measured prevalence was much higher than that reported by local epidemiological surveillance.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralBrazilChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDengueDengue VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MChikungunya virusDengue virusSeroprevalenceZika virus

Identifiers

PMID33234110
PMCPMC7685300
OpenAlexW3108792171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.