Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234083›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Osteohistological analyses reveal diverse strategies of theropod dinosaur body-size evolution.

Thomas M Cullen, Juan I Canale, Sebastián Apesteguía, Nathan D Smith, Dongyu Hu, Peter J Makovicky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas M CullenNauganee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Juan I CanaleCONICET, Área Laboratorio e Investigación, Museo Municipal 'Ernesto Bachmann', Villa El Chocón, Neuquén, Argentina.
Sebastián ApesteguíaCONICET, Área de Paleontología, Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, CEBBAD, Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, 1405 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nathan D SmithDinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Dongyu HuShenyang Normal University, Paleontological Museum of Liaoning, Key Laboratory for Evolution of Past Life and Change of Past Environment, Liaoning Province and Ministry of Natural Resources, 253 North Huanghe Street, 110034 Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Peter J MakovickyNauganee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNatural History Museum of Los Angeles County · USNorth Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences · USShenyang Normal University · CNUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The independent evolution of gigantism among dinosaurs has been a topic of long-standing interest, but it remains unclear if gigantic theropods, the largest bipeds in the fossil record, all achieved massive sizes in the same manner, or through different strategies. We perform multi-element histological analyses on a phylogenetically broad dataset sampled from eight theropod families, with a focus on gigantic tyrannosaurids and carcharodontosaurids, to reconstruct the growth strategies of these lineages and test if particular bones consistently preserve the most complete growth record. We find that in skeletally mature gigantic theropods, weight-bearing bones consistently preserve extensive growth records, whereas non-weight-bearing bones are remodelled and less useful for growth reconstruction, contrary to the pattern observed in smaller theropods and some other dinosaur clades. We find a heterochronic pattern of growth fitting an acceleration model in tyrannosaurids, with allosauroid carcharodontosaurids better fitting a model of hypermorphosis. These divergent growth patterns appear phylogenetically constrained, representing extreme versions of the growth patterns present in smaller coelurosaurs and allosauroids, respectively. This provides the first evidence of a lack of strong mechanistic or physiological constraints on size evolution in the largest bipeds in the fossil record and evidence of one of the longest-living individual dinosaurs ever documented.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBody SizeDinosaursAnimalsBone and BonesFossilsPhylogenybody-size evolutiondinosaurgigantismgrowthosteohistologytheropod

Identifiers

PMID33234083
PMCPMC7739506
OpenAlexW3110230871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.